Transcription: Defected Ep. 92 - MSG Trump rally, Joe Rogan show, Ross Perot, Eisenhower model, Jake Tapper, Chris Cuomo, Sundar, Bezos

whisperx transcription and speaker diarization

The transcript will have at least 2 versions, (1) first transcript (generated mostly automatically but speaker labels were identified manually) and then (2) I watch it through with the version and edit where needed, add paragraph titles for easy navigation.

This is (1) the first minimum version with minimum manual inputs to get it out fast.

This is now (2) the final edit.

Welcome

03:38 --> 04:15

Chaplin: Greed has poisoned men's souls, has barricaded the world with hate, has goose-stepped us into misery and bloodshed. Our knowledge has made us cynical, our cleverness hard and unkind. We think too much, feel too little. The misery that is now upon us is but the passing of greed, the bitterness of men who fear the way of human progress. Don't give yourselves to brutes, men who despise you, enslave you, who regiment your lives, tell you what to do, what to think or what to feel, who drill you, diet you, treat you like cattle, use you as cannon fodder. Don't give yourselves to these unnatural men, machine men with machine minds and machine hearts.

04:28 --> 05:13

Morpheus: Let me tell you why you're here. You're here because you know something. What you know you can't explain, but you feel it. I'm trying to free your mind, but I can only show you the door. You're the one that has to walk through it. You have to let it all go. Fear, doubt, disbelief. Free your mind.

05:30 --> 06:12

BB: What's up, guys? This is Burning Bright. As you can see, Kyle is not here. He was a bit of a last-minute pullout. Hashtag, that's what he said. Because he's got the sniffles, but that's okay. We all get the sniffles. I'm actually not feeling too well myself tonight. But I was thinking, I could either try to do a solo show, and then... Whether or not the show went well would be entirely on my shoulders. So I decided to make it easier on myself, bring in somebody who everybody's going to blame no matter what happens. And that's what I've done. So if my guest wants to introduce himself.

06:13 --> 06:13

Trump: Vagina.

06:13 --> 06:46

Jon: Hey, everybody, it's me. yeah I'm John I'd like to introduce myself. yeah he called me like first he texted me he's like dude Kyle's sick I need help will you please join I was like no absolutely once once a week sometimes twice a week is way too much and then he called me he was just in tears he's hysterical he wouldn't stop crying and so I was like fine whatever whatever I'll do it so here I am but I feel great. you guys are just weaker than me I guess

06:47 --> 06:59

BB: Isn't it? Isn't it so weird? Like, well, not for you because you started. Did you start solo streaming or did you start on somebody else? Okay. So was it weird when you first started solo streaming? Did you feel like it felt weird?

07:00 --> 07:07

Jon: yeah it was kind of awkward like you're just talking to your computer yeah but it's I don't know you get used to it.

07:07 --> 07:43

BB: yeah you get used to it well I i would think that any sort of streaming would be weird but I haven't found it to be weird except when I'm alone on screen if somebody drops out or something yeah it feels totally different even for that 15 seconds or so there. So, yes, John has joined the show. Appreciate him joining. He's been streaming for a couple nights in a row. I wanted to proceed it by saying that I'm not feeling that great so that if we don't go three hours, people will still blame you and they're free to. But it's actually not going to be Jon's fault if we don't. We're going to have a fairly... What are you going to say?

07:43 --> 07:45

Jon: I'm ready. Let's do a four hour show.

07:46 --> 09:04

BB: He's like, just for the competition. This is the time. uh we're gonna have a fairly casual show because you know defected is usually extremely streamlined we very rarely do any kind of weaves or aside like Trump's does like Trump does uh we're gonna keep it pretty casual the Madison Square Garden rally just wrapped up I didn't watch the whole thing but I was perusing clips you know and these sort of things and I feel like we've seen so many of them, especially on the eve of an election, that we're just looking for little signal nuggets. And I think there were a few. I already saw you caught the one that is most Jimmy's wrestling for you. We'll build up to that one. But there's a few other things I think we should look at. And then the second half of the show, we're going to kind of dovetail into just... The lay of the land, not in terms of the nation about the election, but in terms of the media. We were in a private chat earlier today with Chris and Zach and Brad, and we were talking about some of this stuff. The media is acting kind of strange. Some of them are acting exactly how you'd expect them to. Some of them are definitely not acting how you'd expect them to. So we're going to pass some theories back and forth about what could be going on there. But yeah, besides that.

09:06 --> 09:15

Jon: I'm totally just taking Burning Bright's lead here. I'm the wingman on this show. I'm not going to complain even one time if he talks too long. I hope he does.

09:16 --> 09:18

BB: I don't think I'm going to talk a lot tonight. It's just one of those.

09:20 --> 09:21

Jon: I don't believe that at all.

09:22 --> 09:30

BB: Nobody does and nobody should. At least watching Trump on Rogan, I was like, okay, I don't even think I'm that bad.

09:31 --> 09:36

Jon: Well, it depends. sometimes. (BB: it's pretty close.) It can be sometimes.

09:36 --> 09:39

BB: Real men of genius, those old Bud Light commercials.

Ad LuvLitters

09:39 --> 11:05

BB: All right, so before we get into it, we are brought to you tonight by our friends at LuvLitters. They are the prime sponsor of the show, so we want to thank them. Attention all Badlanders with purring pals and feathered friends, say hello to LuvLitters. 100% pure kiln-dried wood, free from chemicals, and oh so kind to Mother Earth. No dust, no mess, no toxins, just a lightweight solution that's gentle on your wallet and even gentler in your home. Our biodegradable litter is crafted from wood destined for landfills, giving it a new purpose in your pet's life. Cats love it. Our astonishing formula works like magic to neutralize that notorious cat urine odor, keeping your home pine fresh and welcoming. For bird lovers, it zaps moisture from bird droppings, crumbling them away, all while being safe if pecked at or ingested. For reptiles and critters too, our mix is crafted to dilute the pine scent, ensuring those little lungs stay happy and healthy. Plus, every 30-pound bag of LuvLitters will last up to six months, saving you money. Transform your pet care routine today. Visit badlandsmedia.tv slash litter. That's badlandsmedia.tv slash litter and breathe easy with a litter that loves your pet as much as you do. And now it might seem a little strange. I did get an email from the marketing team like two months ago that said, when I gave my little anecdotes about LuvLitters, the audience responded. So I do use this kind of litter. Kiln dried. I've used dried walnuts in the past. I have a cat. I'm the rare person with a cat and a dog.

11:05 --> 11:09

Jon: I was going to ask if you yourself go in the litter box or something. You started that a little weird.

11:10 --> 11:54

BB: Mrs. Bright does. Canadians, when you put a Canadian into a new house, it takes them years at times. They have to figure out where they peed in the last one. That's what they're like. Canadian pee, cat pee, it's got that ammonia smell and... What I really noticed switching to this kind of litter is when I went back to my parents' house who have a cat also, they're using that classic store-bought litter. And then I would go into the bathroom and smell those chemicals because they use ammonia and all this stuff in them to get rid of the odor. I'm telling you, it's good stuff. It works. It's way less gross than chemical litters. It's not going to stink up your house. So give it a try and tell them we sent you.

11:55 --> 11:58

Jon: Absolutely. Do you want to do the second ad too right away or?

11:59 --> 12:00

BB: Sure. Let's do it.

12:00 --> 12:01

Jon: All right.

Pet Club 24-7

12:02 --> 12:33

Pet Club 24-7: It's widely known that the body's own immune system is a God given first responder to help us deal with the smallest of concerns to the most catastrophic. Our friends at Pet Club 24-7 have developed natural products that contain the most potent strain of mushroom that's been used for thousands of years to support the immune system. So visit the website today to discover how they're changing the way that pets and people are being treated for the better.

12:36 --> 13:07

BB: See, Mrs. Bright is apparently upset in the chats on her side. But as I said in the chat, Mrs. Bright, like most Canadians, they're kind of like vampires and cats. They're like vampire cats. They can't enter a room. They can't enter a dwelling without being invited in. That's one of those things about Canadians that's what they're so polite and everything they say sorry about everything so that's why we don't have a lot of illegal canadian immigrants because they have to ask for permission to enter any domicile.

13:08 --> 13:13

Jon: Has she ever, like, come into the room while you're streaming and just, like, slapped you for something you said?

13:13 --> 13:27

BB: Yeah, just starts beating me, grabs one of those blades off the wall. No, but occasionally I'll see her just through the glass. My door has glass here, and I'll just kind of see the reflection of Fury staring at me.

13:28 --> 13:34

Jon: Like, she should throw a shoe at you or something sometime. I think that'd be great. You have my full permission, Ms. Bright, anytime you want on a Power Hour.

MSG rally and Joe Rogan Show, Trump is Hitler

13:35 --> 14:25

BB: well we've uh she can go to bed safely now she listens to the first five minutes of every show uh to see if she gets a mention she got her mention and now she can go to bed uh it was not a flattering mention so MSG rally okay MSG rally we've got this will set it up for you I'm going to share a few things uh but to start off From what we're told, 95,000 people in the area around MSG. I don't know if that's true or not, but I did see a lot of videos about the crowds outside. 19,500 within the building. So we can just take a look at this, take it in. I mean, you get the impression. Um, it's insane.

14:26 --> 14:31

Jon: See, I had no idea this was even happening today. Like I've been, I've been tuned out all day long.

14:33 --> 14:42

BB: Yeah. I had, I had forgotten about it. I remember actually Kyle and I on a show several weeks ago, people will remember we were talking about MSG and actually what's going on with you.

14:44 --> 14:45

Jon: She did it. Ms. Bright came in through a shoe.

14:47 --> 16:11

BB: She did something. The dog got mad. Um, We were talking about this a few weeks ago on the show, and actually what's kind of funny about it is the MSG plans were going around at the beginning of October, and it was the same week that some people started talking about, will Trump go on Rogan? And Kyle and I did a whole segment speculating on whether or not the Rogan interview would happen. And if it would happen, when it would happen. So we ultimately kind of erred on the side of it'll actually happen after the election. Because I was sort of thinking, when would the deployment be the most effective? Would it be leading up to the election or would it be in the midst of... Crazy clownish bullshit in the immediate aftermath. Obviously that didn't happen, but I thought there was kind of a lot of signal to the MSG stuff. It's the UFC is actually going there the weekend that we're in Myrtle Beach. Dana White was at this rally. It's the site of Ali Frazier. It's the site of so many famous boxing and now UFC fights. It's kind of known as a Coliseum. And obviously it's just the heart of liberal dumb according to what we're told and he's got 100 000 people supposedly in attendance there but yeah what do you think just about you know what's what's the reason for it and and do you think it has any impact

16:12 --> 16:46

Jon: Well, it's interesting for a couple reasons. First, it's like his stomping grounds. That's where he's from. That's where his big buildings are. I mean, that's his hometown. And then also, it's the place where he's been indicted. And the most shenanigans against him legally outside of the Jack Smith stuff is taking place. For him to go there and have this huge crowd, I mean, that's nuts. The only things I've seen on Twitter today about this rally have been from this one first. Let me share my screen. We got Mary Trump.

16:48 --> 16:48

BB: Yep.

16:49 --> 17:04

Jon: Which I think this is stupid because you could take any picture of a Democrat at a rally or the DNC convention, whatever, and put it next to this. And it's just a picture of the rally. It's just so stupid. But Alexander Vindman did the same thing.

17:04 --> 17:06

BB: I had that one pulled up too. Yeah.

17:07 --> 17:23

Jon: Like what? But no, I think it's crazy. Like you said, in the middle of the center of liberal dumb and he's got this kind of crowd. It's pretty and it's spicy there, man. Like some of the clips I've seen, the two I've seen have already been like just dasting itself. But I think we're going to work out that.

17:23 --> 18:19

BB: So we'll get to them. I'll show you that. I'll show the Vindman one if you want to share mine here just because of the commentary that goes along with it. So we've got. I've resisted calling Trump and MAGA fascists. Can we get a fact? Can we get a Snopes on that? Has he never called us fascists? Mainly because I've understood fascism and Nazism as almost incomprehensibly evil. But the reality is MAGA is today who the Nazis were before they seized power. There's no better historical comparison to MAGA than the Nazis of the 1930s. Like you said, I mean, obviously it's... it's ridiculous I mean they weren't even doing this stuff this on the nose years ago during the early advent of the Trump stuff. um (Jon: it appears that was a lie) fascist to the core well he said Trump it maybe he was he's trying to get away with a technicality

18:20 --> 18:33

Jon: but here he says everyone will be vulnerable as the fascists go through purity tests to determine who they want to be American. The Russians have a story to pursue. I'm just trying to see what else. Want to be fascist, real Donald Trump.

18:34 --> 18:38

BB: So he said he wants to be a fascist, not that he was successfully being one.

18:39 --> 19:00

Jon: wannabe a lot of wannabe fascists that he's definitely used. I mean okay for how many times how many tweets is it he's definitely called him a fascist there's no way yeah I mean it's like you said Trump is a fascist.

19:00 --> 19:30

BB: he's never called maga fascist right he's never called a disembodied concept fascist but like you said the. It's ridiculous on its face. I mean, besides the fact that we're not Nazis, their proof of us being Nazis is that there's a crowd of people at a political rally. It's absolutely hilarious. It's obviously because they can't draw crowds. A few of the chyrons from the mainstream media, MSNBC, Trump's MSG rally comes 85 years after pro-Nazi rally at famed arena.

19:31 --> 19:32

Jon: They've got nothing else.

19:33 --> 19:51

BB: CNN Trump leans into hateful rhetoric on immigration at rally. Trump re-ups vile rhetoric about migrants. Trump forgoes prompter to rant about conspiracies. I'd sign off on the three, the next three, just not the Nazi rally one.

19:52 --> 20:17

Jon: yeah that's all they got though. like when your only attack point is calling him a Nazi repeatedly and it's the most absurd comparison and I can't imagine what the normie is thinking when they hear this like are they actually like oh my god we're about to elect Hitler? Hitler's gonna win are they actually or do they buy into any of that well I think that's one of the main questions I think we'll touch on it more too in our in our second half of the show but

20:18 --> 21:43

BB: I mean, these are the questions we ask ourselves. My feeling is that even lefty normies, I don't think that they've come to Trump or anything like that. But what I sense out of them is just kind of exhaustion at this kind of rhetoric where they're just going... You know, it's the boy who cried wolf thing. I mean, it's one of the oldest sort of fables, right? And it's just universal. It's universally recognized that when you just say the most inflammatory possible thing over and over again, it loses its effect. Kyle actually had made a... An analogy last weekend, he called it something called the Shepard's tone, where it's like it's this concept in sound or in music where this tone can keep getting higher. But as you get used to it, if you perceive it actually getting less loud, like it decreases in volume, even though technically it's increasing. And we were comparing that to the info war where it's like, OK, the first time You call a new American president or candidate Hitler and his party, you know, his followers, Nazis. It's really effective, right? The 10,000th time in the seventh year of doing it after he was in office for four years and didn't do Nazi stuff, as far as we're aware. I just don't know if it's the right playbook.

21:44 --> 22:22

Jon: I just don't understand I mean it would be effective to call somebody a nazi if they did something nazi-ish but Trump trump hasn't the stuff that they're using to like accuse him of being a nazi is stuff that they've taken out of context like the he's going to be a dictator on day one he said it himself he's like I'm just gonna be a dictator to shut down the border and get everybody out of here that's it and just on day one for an hour whatever They don't show any of that extra stuff. At what point do you hear this from a Rachel Maddow and realize, you know what? I haven't actually seen any evidence that he's going to do a Nazi thing. Where are they getting this from?

Even normies laugh at maskies

22:22 --> 23:48

BB: yeah and I think I think part of the exhaustion sometimes I think people in this like people that are watching this show are the most engaged info war type of people there are. So obviously everyone in their personal lives friends and acquaintances you're if you're watching this show you're that person right like we're all that person that people are like don't get into a conversation with them about it unless like if you're gonna disagree or else you'll get smoked um so maybe that's where I perceive some of the exhaustion it's just people in my family and friends are like just don't bring it up. it's not going to go well but I really think there's more to it and I think this nazi stuff It's gotten to the point where I've started equating them to like the people who are still masking, if you see any of them around. I saw a few of them around a few weeks ago, like locally. We're outside at a cafe and I saw a family of four or five just maskies walk up the steps. They were getting off a ferry, walked up to a cafe and we're looking at them. There's like 50 people around. Nobody with masks on. And then, of course, they're taking their masks off to eat a pastry and a croissant or something like that. It's like at that point, you're just laughing at people. Even liberals are looking at the maskies and being like, guys, it's we were the ones who thought this was all real. And even we know that it's fake now. Just stop doing this.

23:49 --> 24:30

Jon: those type of people almost remind me of do you ever hear that story of that guy I think he was from japan it was World War II and he like went out into the jungle and he was like at his post in the jungle and the war ended and like literally 30 years later people were out in the jungle and they discovered this guy he's still like at his post like doing World War II stuff he had no idea that it ended like no idea stuff moved everybody moved on from this war things are completely different he's just fighting this World War II for 30 years That's what those people remind me of. Like, what are you doing? Have you turned off all television devices and not realized that the whole thing was bullshit? That's what liberals are. They're the jungle Japanese guy from World War II.

24:30 --> 25:45

BB: Jungle-dwelling Japanese veterans. Yeah. But I think there's something going on that's similar to that when it comes to Trump is Hitler 2.0 or 3.0, whatever the deployment is at now. And we are all Nazis. Where... a liberal, Chris kind of frames them this way, a liberal who wants to be taken seriously is no longer going to deploy Trump is Hitler, MAGA is Nazi rhetoric because they know so many people who are MAGA just in their day-to-day lives. They work with people who are MAGA. They go to restaurants with people like that. People in their family are MAGA, right? Like Uncle Todd is MAGA. So they know that when they just call us all Nazis, it makes them look absolutely absurd and... I mean, I guess this is just it also dovetails into the ideas of, you know, theories of patriot control over the media, which is supposed to be our second topic. But this is kind of an appetizer for it, where sometimes, ironically, I think that the most ridiculous cartoonish rhetoric that they're deploying, it's the stuff that is helping Trump more than anything else.

25:46 --> 27:11

Jon: Yeah, I would agree with that. And there's so many thoughts I'm having right now. And I don't know what order to do this, but one thing I want to talk about at some point is the media at some point is going to have to do an about face and like I think we saw a little bit of Jake Tapper doing that today I don't know if you saw his thing with JD Vance (BB: no) okay because he basically JD Vance was calling him out now I'll just play the clip here in a second but I just want to summarize JD Vance was calling him out for his Russia collusion collusion hoax that they were pushing and Tapper's like no we didn't do that we didn't do that we didn't do any of that we were covering an FBI investigation we didn't lie we didn't just totally denied reality about what they actually did to push that narrative forward and is that what they're are they just going to deny that this entire period of eight years that they pushed all this happened or are they are they gonna like no matter what we can't allow them to get away with any of that but are they gonna try and will everybody else allow them to get away with it is connie can allow them to get away with that because along with the election fraud apparatus the narrative control apparatus of the mainstream media is one of the biggest tools they've had for a long time they've been able to do a lot of With that, another thing I want to talk about at some point is comparing 2024 to 2020. What is actually different between the campaigns? Because Trump had huge rallies then Trump had all this momentum and a lot of things were the same back then. Why is this different? So we should. Yeah, but let's let's go your whatever, however you want to do it.

27:12 --> 27:21

BB: I'll just write a note down there. It reminds me, actually, speaking of the Nazi stuff that you had brought up, I think, on Wednesday night, Matt Walsh's tweet from 2016.

27:21 --> 27:23

Jon: What a banger.

27:23 --> 28:39

BB: I mean, is that much different than... Keep in mind, if you're going to pull it up, what we just saw with Vindman calling us Nazis comparing these to nazi to maga rallies and uh yeah Matt Walsh 2016 if this were germany in the 1930s Trump fans would seriously be voting for hitler the ultra based am I racist worldwide leader in trans content matt walsh the most bastest of the based dudes was calling all of us Nazis in 2016 do you guys think he doesn't think we're Nazis anymore or do you think he's made tens of millions of dollars off of the people he thinks are Nazis and so he no longer calls them Nazis it's one of those two I would submit and I think I know which one I lean I hate those people much much much more than people like Vinman because You know, at least people like Vindman have the good sense to remain hateful communists, you know, in plain sight. The people like Walsh and Shapiro and Owens and, you know, all that kind of stuff, they're very selective about when they're global communists and when they're ultra MAGA.

28:40 --> 29:07

Jon: Do you think they get a choice? Do you think there's a meeting and it's like, okay, Walsh, Shapiro, Thurnovich, you guys are going to go back to mega, pretend to be mega, but Vindman, you're just going to be anti-Trump everything. Was there a meeting where they divvied these roles up? Because to me, I see all these people on the same side at the end of the day. They're all anti-Trump. They're all Con Inc. I mean, that's what they are. How is any of that behavior different? Or like you said, it's worse.

29:07 --> 30:47

BB: It's worse. It's worse than, I mean, there's a, there's a reason, you know, part of it's like the Sutter fusion and the twists and turns. But if you think of kind of a war fiction wartime fiction. I feel like the fiction that people grab onto the most it's spy stuff right like James Bond, 007, Mission Impossible that's not really war stuff Mission Impossible but clandestine operations like they're they're much more fascinating to people these days than um traditional war films there was an era of traditional war films like here's these guys here's those guys this is a war film but the war films that kind of stand the test of time I mean you watch a football game and tonight I had one on literally a commercial came like a montage commercial came on I think CBS for three different versions of the show FBI there are three concurrently running shows that start with FBI and it's like FBI Miami, FBI this, FBI that, right? So there's something that people are fascinated with about clandestine operators that also means liars right professional liars so I think the reason is people like human beings have long understood that those are the much more dangerous enemy, right? The people that were in the base, the people that were in your headquarters or in your house that you thought were good are way more threatening than the people that you knew were bad the whole time. And that's why we are the only ones out there consistently calling them out probably more than the Vindmans of the world.

30:47 --> 31:15

Jon: you know what's interesting about what you just said there is that is what Trump was to them like he was in that world he was in their circles like he knew all these people but at the end of the day he turned out to be a good dude and he wasn't part of their little club and to them that's the biggest threat they could they could foresee is somebody who knows about everything going on but didn't partake in any of it and wants to tear it all down Like that's a that's a great, great analogy I just made. Wow. That was brilliant.

31:15 --> 31:20

BB: Sort of like a sort of makes you think of Batman, doesn't it? It's become a running. I wouldn't go that far.

Negative indicators vs positive indicators, Trump went to a military academy, Reform Party

31:20 --> 33:11

BB: It's become a running gag on defected that I think we've we've accidentally done like five Batman episodes in a row because everything just kept happening that was about a Batman theme but you know going going even back to the Con Inc section or the whose choice is it with these media people. um you can think of that with the Trump stuff too the timeline there is fascinating like and it works both ways you could have was Trump just a good dude who was kind of rubbed elbows with all of these influential people, media types, moguls, business people, all the above. and then the the military recruited him because they knew he was a good guy and knew all of these people and could walk in those worlds or was it was he in those worlds because he was long ago recruited the military and there's not a lot of sauce on either argument but it is difficult to get away from the fact that Trump did go to a military academy and to me like one of the things I say in the info war a lot I'm somebody who negative indicators mean more to me than positive indicators. So to me, like you're somebody who are attracted to positive indicators. Like when you find, you're like, I found proof of something, which obviously is valuable, right? But for me, it's not that we have proof that Trump attended a military academy. It's the fact that nobody talks about it, right? Like Trump doesn't talk about it. It's never a part of his campaign strategy. He never tries to use that to be like, I've been involved in the military my whole life, like my family. And the media never goes after him for anything like this. To me, it's a negative indicator of being like, this is a really interesting little thing here about Trump being at a military academy, even if he wasn't part of the military.

33:12 --> 34:35

Jon: Okay, thinking of that and talking about the military coming to him, I'll turn off my devolution brain for a little bit with the specifics, the positive indicators, as you said. Let's say they did come to Trump and they asked him to run and they want to do this thing. And we're going to assume that Trump was Trump was the guy that was going to do this the whole time. OK, because maybe maybe he wasn't. Maybe there are other options they have that didn't get (BB: candidates maybe). Yeah. But let's just assume Trump was the guy and he's been the guy for decades like that. Once he got in here, he was that was the go order to clean everything out. They just had to get him in. Something I learned during the Joe Rogan interview that I had no idea before, which blows my mind because I've been following and studying Trump for years, is he ran as president for the Reform Party back in 1990. I had no idea he actually did that. I knew he dabbled with some media stuff. Maybe run for president. Maybe do this. Maybe. I didn't know he actually tried to run. and I wonder if that was like was that an attempt by the white hats and those guys was Trump on board then and they like okay well this is our shot we got nowhere let's abandon it for a while or was that like okay we saw him he did this by himself and got seven percent of a vote or whatever maybe he maybe he could do it with an actual nomination okay that's just nobody talks about that either though his reform party run I haven't heard that brought up anywhere ever

34:36 --> 35:48

BB: Mm hmm. That's well, that's a great example. I had written an article that came out today actually about the Trump Rogan interview, and I didn't put that in it, but it was, I think, in that section There's a lot of like, people think we're crazy, but we're not. That's an example of the fact that we didn't really know that and that that's just not something that people talk about, that Trump talks about. The fact that he said it there, he was the one who said it, that's what we call signal, right? Those are the things where it's like, Trump seems like he's meandering all over the place and he's bobbing and weaving, but then he drops things. Like at the beginning of that episode, Rogan asked him about inauguration. This is what people miss in the Trump asides. They will often say, well, Trump didn't say that himself. He was prompted to say something, right? But the whole point of an aside is that you can get back to answering the question, but then say whatever you want in the middle, right? That's what Trump does. At the beginning, Rogan's like, tell me about Inauguration Day. So Trump starts telling him about Inauguration Day and then just does this little diatribe on Melania's dress.

35:49 --> 35:54

Jon: So if you're a normie bedroom to like he went on a five minute aside with the Lincoln bedroom. Sorry.

35:54 --> 36:41

BB: And I have no no. And it's a good point. I have no idea why. Right. But I believe I know Trump enough now to know that there's something to that. There's something to Lincoln. There's something he wants us to be thinking about, about that time period, maybe even about that bedroom or his time in the White House. But for a lot of people, they'd be like, why is he? Why is he focusing on Melania's dress? But to Q people, it's like a bright blue flare. Melania's dress is something that we autistically focused on as being a replica of Jackie Kennedy's dress. And he bookends, he starts the Rogan episode by basically making a vague reference to the Kennedys. And then he ends it by talking about JFK and declassification and everything.

Was Ross Perot the first attempt by the White Hats to get in there

36:41 --> 36:47

BB: But to your point about 1990 and then I think you were talking about on Friday night, Ross Perot, right? He was the he was.

36:47 --> 37:30

Jon: That's how it got brought up. And first of all, I didn't realize that Melania was wearing a replica of Kennedy's dress. I had no idea about that until you mentioned on the show. So that's interesting. But he started by talking about he considered running back in the day. He supported a lot of people with the Reform Party and he just and it was me digging into the Reform Party trying to figure out who he was talking about. um because I don't think he directly said that he was he ran back in 1990 I just think he said he was involved with the reform party pretty heavily and that's where so I found that on on my own research which is so he didn't directly mention it but he got me digging on it and I still think that's

37:31 --> 37:55

BB: okay yeah because I didn't I didn't remember him saying that either but um yeah that's fascinating I just wanted to show you the dress thing and Ross Perot that's from that's from before I was deep into politics I was into conspiracy theory I mean not in the 90s I was a kid but I just mean I never went back to that era but a lot of conservatives will bring up Ross Perot as like an infamous kind of figure but it's it's something I i knew very little about I'm trying to find

37:58 --> 38:24

Jon: Trump has a few Twitter posts about Ross Perot from back in the day. 2013, real Donald Trump. Ross Perot had the right idea, but not your brains or balls, Mr. Trump. In 2015, are you like another Ross Perot when real Donald Trump says, bigger, better, stronger, and richer? Now that Ross Perot is gone, I can tell a story. Was Ross Perot the first attempt by the White Hats to get in there?

38:26 --> 38:54

BB: Well, that it is kind of actually funny that he's one of I feel like he's one of the few America first figures from that era that people will come us up to us at Gart that have been following this stuff forever. And they're like, that's the only one they still like. Right. Like they've been we've been I've been soured on most Democrats in history besides JFK. Most people in our audience have been soured on all Republicans, essentially. But they'll be like, yeah, Ross Perot tried.

38:54 --> 39:53

Jon: uh yeah maybe rant I mean maybe Ron Paul um they hold in high regard but there's very few yeah I don't mind Ron actually I like Ron Paul until last week he tweeted about the directive thing he was another one of those that that fell for it got on my shit list but right Yeah, that's interesting. I hope someday they come out with a book of all this stuff, like those guys, the white hat guys. They don't have to reveal everything, but I would love to know the history of how far back some of the stuff actually went and the planning. Because that's the aspect of the Q stuff that I find very intriguing and interesting that's not really necessarily part of the Devolution stuff, other than somebody will ask on a show, like, how far back do you think this started? When did they start planning for it? And the positive indicators, the evidence that I can put forth is very minimal. They added an annex to the national security strategy in 2019 or whatever. Maybe they started planning it then. But it's likely that it goes back way further than that.

39:53 --> 42:48

BB: Yeah. And I think this is, yeah, this is, so this is just an example for anybody who's not aware of this. Uh, this was Melania's dress inauguration dress. Um, uh, I am color challenged, but it is apparently called Tiffany's blue, like Tiffany's diamonds, Tiffany's blue. Um, this is, um, this is uh yeah exactly that's what I had said in my article so this is Jackie Kennedy um you've got her tiffany's blue dress apparently she was you know very she was a huge pop culture figure of course because it was they called it camelot right they called the white house camelot during this era because you had these young attractive um you know first lady and uh and president good good Irish folks from the northeast but to your point this is something that anon's like Q followers have been talking about for a long time when it when it comes to not positive indicators of how far back does the plan go but those are more negative indicators like the the analogs the the fact that it's tiffany's blue and the fact that um I believe she gave I believe I believe Melania was holding a Tiffany's box somebody in chat maybe could find that was that the president she gave um I she gave Michelle yeah um I see Tiffany blue box (Jon: yeah Michelle Obama reveals what was in the Tiffany box from Melania Trump) so all right yeah I've got a yeah um the photo there here my it's showing on my screen So this is a better way to frame why this is significant. The handoff of power, right? Symbolic, you've got a replica of Jackie Kennedy's dress and you've got her holding a Tiffany's box. Jackie Kennedy was infamous for her love of Tiffany's diamonds. It's like one of the, it's probably the defining characteristic of Jackie Kennedy. Tire books written about her and the style and everything everybody every woman in the country was dressing like her and they were they were Tiffany's was the sign of your husband being like John he if he got you the best from Tiffany's and the point you just brought up is exactly what I had said in my article today I'd said my favorite aside in the Rogan conversation was those little touches of Melania's dress and And how many times has Trump not just talked about election fraud, but given a very specific repeated analogy of Tiffany's diamonds, not just diamonds, but Tiffany's diamonds. It's like when you got the diamond, you know, when they steal the diamonds from Tiffany's, you've got to return the diamonds. And then you've got on inauguration in the handoff of power, Melania giving a Tiffany's box to Michelle.

42:49 --> 43:06

Jon: It's supposedly a picture frame too. Like I wonder if that's like, that could be a lot of things, but it's like, hey, you guys tried to frame us for some things. So here's a frame back to you. But yeah, it's interesting that what you picked up on the Rogan interview and what I picked up is like most important are two totally different.

43:06 --> 43:07

BB: Yeah.

43:07 --> 43:14

Jon: Yeah. Because mine was all like election fraud. He's talking about election fraud here. Like that was a confirmation of the machines being crooked. That's huge. That's everything.

43:14 --> 43:14

BB: Yeah.

43:15 --> 43:20

Jon: But like to the more Q leaning people, that's it's all this other stuff. And I love that.

43:20 --> 43:24

BB: Well, and this week in particular, it's been interesting.

Eisenhower model, restoring civilian control, continuity of government, PEADs

43:24 --> 44:47

BB: We were talking, I put out a little thread after our conversation the other day we were having in chat just about, or no, it was from Wednesday night when we were talking about the Eisenhower model. When you're looking for these positive indicators, it makes sense, even though it's not satisfying, that if in a hypothetical scenario, if this is a long, long-term plan, that goes back decades or generations by patriots to kind of destabilize uh to to wage a counter insurgency it stands to reason there wouldn't be a lot of positive indicators because if there were there's a reason these guys felt they had to go underground I personally think the reason they felt they had to go underground is because they took the presidency and then they killed JFK so I think patriots went we are a lot further from power than we think we are. I think it started with Eisenhower or in the aftermath of Eisenhower and we were talking about the Eisenhower model and then that letter that I had found from 1958 where Eisenhower is sending a letter to Congress talking all about civilian control, restoring civilian control over the chain of command. And then that's what you've been talking about a ton when it comes to Kash Patel, Donald Trump, civilian control over the military. That sounds like exactly the sort of thing that a long term plan had in mind.

44:48 --> 45:12

Jon: And see, when I hear Eisenhower model, I go back and think about pretty much the origins. I know it's not the technical origins. Some of this stuff goes back to the 1700s. But in terms of executive branch presidential documented origins of continuity of government, it started under Eisenhower. And it was all this stuff using PEADs to implement their version of continuity government.

45:12 --> 45:28

BB: Yeah, that sets up. I'll play a couple of quick clips from the rally, but our first one up before we get to the one you most, I'm just going to tease you until later. I like that tease a little. Speaking of the Eisenhower model, shout out to Pepe here.

45:30 --> 45:53

Trump: Kamala Harris has orchestrated the most egregious betrayal that any leader in American history has ever inflicted upon our people. She has violated her oath, eradicated our sovereign border and unleashed an Army of migrant gangs who are waging a campaign of violence and terror against our citizens.

45:53 --> 46:03

BB: so it's nothing totally new for us but what are your thoughts on that in light of Eisenhower, Eisenhower model, Kamala.

46:03 --> 47:48

Jon: I like it. I mean, the border question has been one of the most repeated and often ones, especially used to almost debunk a devolution. It's like, how could devolution be in place if there are people coming in over the border? And so I love it because it's like, not only is it something I don't think they could have taken care of if they wanted to, but it's one of the biggest red pills. And it almost like it had to be this way at the border in order for Trump to get back the momentum and kind of win over the country like the border has been his number one thing since 2015 when he came down the escalator and it's carried on throughout and so you obviously needed like a wide open border on day one of the next administration in order for Trump to like campaign on that again and show the the distinction between the two the two policies like it's so huge so Anytime he talks about this border stuff, I think it's fascinating. But it's going to be more fascinating to see how he actually resolves this. Because he's mentioned a couple different things. He has said the Dwight Eisenhower model. But then he's also said the Alien Enemies Act. And those are two completely different things stemming from completely different authorities. One of them, the Alien Enemies Act, being like wartime authorities. And he says he's going to use that on day one. So I mean it's probably gonna be a little bit of hybrid of both but um that's the stuff that I key in on. It's like well how is he saying he's going to take care of this what authorities is he going to need to do it that way and why do I think that's like relevant because no matter what if he's going to use the alien enemy act on day one he's not going to get congress to declare a war on the border on day one especially not knowing what congress is going to look like So I believe an act of war has already been declared. And so that's why, you know, it's stuff like that that I key in on. But yeah, the border is such a fascinating.

47:48 --> 49:40

BB: Well, the point you made to lead that off to is this thing that we respond to the most and obviously we're just we don't know. We don't know what the plan is. Right. But. In terms of damages, that's the word I always think of in the Devo term. First of all, I think that a lot of the damages have been overstated, but that's an opinion. I understand that I don't live in a border state. There are these damages that other people allege. You know, I question everything that we see in the media. You know, was was this sensational migrant murder story real? Did it happen when they said it did? But even if we take all the damages at face value, I think I think this tells us two things. Number one, It tells us one of the big reasons why we're never going to get the kind of disclosure, direct positive indicator disclosure that people like us would want about a devolution operation. Because even though we could rationalize everything that's been going on, including the border situation that you bring up, which is probably the most controversial. Lots of people can't. Lots of people, even in our audience or in the MAGA audience, they cannot get their heads around, what do you mean you allowed these bad things to happen just to show people the problem? But look at what we were just talking about in the previous segment. Let's say the plan goes back further, right? It goes back to post JFK, et cetera. Well, it stands to reason then that patriots at various points over the decades, if there were these generals lying in wait, if there were these candidates lying in wait and it was an option to come in and wipe out the deep state and the Black Hawk helicopters and all that, why wasn't it done? Because obviously, They're weighing the pros and cons.

Eat your cake and have it too. We're in a war vs Patriot in total control. National Essential Functions

49:40 --> 50:36

BB: They're weighing long-term success because it's a war. And I think my reading on why sometimes the Q drops, like the tone of the drops would come off almost as sort of like a parental discipline, I'm missing the word right now, but they would kind of come off like scolding the audience of reminding anons that it was a war. And I think that this kind of a topic is exactly what the Q team is saying, like, yeah, It's a war. There's certain decisions that have to be made, but these people have more data than anybody else does. So if they're determining like, yep, turns out, according to all our advanced models, that leaving the border open for a four year disaster term is actually in the better long term interests of the country than just sealing it all off and then having some future president undo it all.

50:37 --> 51:13

Jon: Okay, having not read the drops, I have a question. In terms of what you said there about Q sometimes scolding people about, yeah, this is a war. Sometimes different decisions have to be made. How do people come away from the Q drops then also believing absolute full control? Because there's a lot of people out there that do. I wholeheartedly disagree with it. But I just don't understand. Sometimes I feel like I get shown a Q drop from somebody. I'm like, okay, this is interesting. But it totally contradicts other Q drops that you've shown me or claims that you've made. And sometimes I feel like there's some pickiness and choosiness.

51:13 --> 51:13

BB: Yeah.

51:14 --> 51:34

Jon: they'll pick the ones that you know push one theory forward but then they'll ignore the other ones that don't and then you know what I mean which yeah I'm sure I do the same thing with some of my devolution stuff absolutely it's the confirmation bias but like something like that I think that yeah that's true depending how they actually were dicks I'm sure you paraphrased a little bit yeah I did I feel like that debunks a lot of the full control stuff

51:35 --> 52:20

BB: Yeah, and I was paraphrasing. I mean, just the tone of them. It would say, you know, reminder that this is a war. You know, operators in real danger have been some of the drops we're talking about operators that are out in the field and comms being sent back and forth. But I agree that people take, I mean, I followed the Q drops. I believe that they were part of from the Military Info Dissemination Program. I think you do too. It's in your Devolution series. It seems likely. But I also think that people do try to have their cake and eat it too with the drops. I mean, the drops talked about plausible deniability and everything.

52:21 --> 52:22

Jon: It's eat your cake and have it too. That's the real way.

52:23 --> 52:24

BB: No, it isn't, is it?

52:25 --> 52:28

Jon: Yes, sir. It is. You keep talking. I'll prove you wrong.

52:28 --> 52:31

BB: Is there a document about this? Was this an executive order decree?

52:31 --> 52:53

Jon: Yeah. Well, no, it's from I watched this movie or this series a long time ago about the Unabomber. And it's all about like the language that the Unabomber used in his letters and stuff and his manifesto. And that was one of them. Like, eat your cake and have it, too. And everybody's like, that's wrong, that's wrong. But it's like, no, actually, that's how it is.

52:53 --> 52:58

BB: The court of public opinion ruled that the original saying was wrong and they reversed it.

52:59 --> 53:04

Jon: Hey, it might have been wrong originally, but that's how it originally was. Let me find it. But you keep going.

53:04 --> 54:51

BB: But yeah, we're going to, in our second topic, talk more about Patriot control in terms of media, but in terms of just the overall plan. That's why I play with it. That's why I do the bicameral thing all the time and say, okay, is it game theory? I think it's more game theory. When I say full control, it's all about how you define it. When I say full control, I think that there's more direct control over... some of the players on the game board, like in positions of power. But I don't think that there's some sort of magical control over everything that's happening on the southern border and every single choice that every person is making within the machine. You know, there's going to be kind of a cascade effect. That's just how I look at it. But I think that, like you say in your series, the National Essential Functions, that's control. I think they have full control over the protection of National Essential Functions. So for me, that's why I don't look at the National Essential Functions in light of the Q drops as being goals of the devolution operation. I look at those as being prerequisites, like... we have these we have full control of these meaning when I see news stories about southern border things okay maybe some of those damages are happening and they don't have full control over it right? but when I see Russia is going to launch a nuke. no they're not. I mean we're or if they are we're going to be fine. that those are some of the NEF type things that I think I think there is a 0.0 chance that um anybody in the deep state has access to a existentially threatening set of circumstances for the us so that would be pretty direct control even though it's not full control.

54:52 --> 55:41

Jon: yeah it's direct control of a few things. I like the way you said that um and this is where it could be interesting here in these last few days and months as as the deep state like gets to the end of its rope with with not just the time like they're running out of time but they're running out of narrative they maybe they've run out of narrative rope already but they're gonna like pull whatever moves they have left right but I think we've seen evidence that they don't have access to certain things like the kid in the baby proofed house right they don't have access to the PEADs I think we have proof of that I don't think they have access to the nuclear codes maybe we don't have proof of that but I do have um proof that eat your cake and have it too was the original phrasing this is the use in uh literature you son of a bitch you have a chart It's from the Unabomber, man. It was first used.

55:41 --> 56:05

BB: Eat your cake and have it too. I will admit that from a pure linguistic perspective, it actually makes more logical sense the way you're saying it. because the saying is meant to imply that you can't continue to have your cake and eat it, but you can have your cake and then eat it. You can't eat your cake and then have it.

56:05 --> 56:07

Jon: Told you. Glad you agree with me.

56:08 --> 56:20

BB: This is devastating. This is one of the most devastating on-air moments I think we've had. But as Chris would say... I think this is great. It's the joy of having been wrong in this one example.

56:21 --> 56:22

Jon: I'm still waiting for one of those joyous moments.

56:23 --> 56:49

BB: I've been wrong about, yeah. Have you, have you ever thought about instituting like dad's executive orders? You know, you're such a doc cause you can, you can tell kids anything. They'll believe anything. You could be like, cause you're always appealing to executive where it's like, okay, you're in an argument with Jon. He's going to find a document and that the executive order says, so like when the kids are getting older, I'm thinking dad's executive orders.

56:49 --> 57:51

Jon: I like that. I like that a lot. My son's at this age right now. It's, it's really fun. Like he's, he's learning to like read and write and he's, he doesn't always spell it right, but he can read very well. Like he's one of the better readers in his class. And teacher said like a very bright kid, but now I have to like, (BB: they say that about all the kids). I have to be careful. His test scores were off the charts, too. But I have to be careful about even just being on my phone, scrolling through Twitter now. I'm not even going to repeat one of the ones, but I'm going to look like a bad parent. But it's just some of the things that are on Twitter are not necessarily kid-friendly. Some swear words. He said a swear word one time. What does that mean? And I'm like, uh, nothing. But he's just so he's asking questions about everything. And the other day he got onto like the topic of, um, of the shape of the earth or something. And I was like, the way I was trying to answer him already was like, well, that's what they tell us. That's what they tell us. That's what we're told. I haven't been there, so I can't confirm it myself. I don't know. It's just it's funny. But I like the dad executive orders. I'm going to do that.

57:51 --> 58:09

BB: Yeah. I mean, I feel like just as if you brainwash them early enough into being like, no, like if we ever have this, you're free to disagree with me. But there are national there are household essential functions that they've been caught. And you can just have a drawer that's like, should we check that? Should we check the deals?

58:10 --> 58:12

Jon: The deals and I love it.

58:12 --> 58:19

BB: They can check them themselves. They can cross reference them, see if they catch you in something. But you got to button those up before.

58:20 --> 58:46

Jon: See, that's the thing. You don't get into arguments unless you know for sure you're right and you can back it up. That's the success to any argument. Guys, if you want to win an argument, no way. Don't go into it unless you know for sure you can win. It's like sometimes in our private chats, even like I'll just if you guys are talking about stuff and like I might disagree with something, I won't even bother until I know it's like I can disagree with this and prove you wrong. So now is when I'm going to chime in.

58:47 --> 58:48

BB: And then I immediately reverse position.

58:49 --> 58:58

Jon: Yep, immediately. And then somebody else comes in and sides your original argument. They're like, yeah, well, I agree with that. I believe that too. It can be both somehow.

58:59 --> 59:15

BB: It could be either or, which means you have to exist in a world as if it could be one or the other. The Irish way of argument is to just wade in and then you'll just have to trust the muse that you're going to find your way out of there at some point.

59:16 --> 59:27

Jon: That's not even like, it's not even whether you win or not. It's just you have more patience and perseverance maybe than the other person. Because I've been in those arguments where like I know I'm right, but I'm just so sick of fighting with you that I'm just, whatever.

59:27 --> 59:29

BB: Are those all arguments in your mind?

Trump: He and I have a secret with the House

59:31 --> 59:58

BB: (Jon: with you sometimes yeah) see this is the problem this is what we both think let's not fight in front of the kids all right yeah sorry we're mostly going well uh all right (Jon: I've been gone through one divorce we don't need another) all right let's get to the ultimate Jimmy's Rustler from this MSG rally this one is one of the more fascinating things that I think Trump has said in a long time

59:58 --> 01:00:24

Trump: Because we can take the Senate pretty easily. And I think with our little secret, we're going to do really well with the House, right? Our little secret is having a big impact. He and I have a secret. We'll tell you what it is when the race is over. Because we can take the Senate pretty easily. And I think with our little secret, we're going to do really well with the House, right? Our little secret is having a big impact. He and I have a secret. We'll tell you what it is.

01:00:25 --> 01:00:32

BB: Now, was he speaking to Matt Gaetz? Because I saw some people claiming Matt Gaetz and some people claiming Mike Johnson.

01:00:33 --> 01:00:50

Jon: I'm not sure. I see that's the thing. I would love to know who he's pointing to and who talked before. Chat, can you tell us? Somebody help us out with some proof of what he actually... Maybe the full clip. I can go find the full clip in a little bit. I just want to point out, this is a great comment from the chat. Real Miss Bright.

01:00:50 --> 01:00:51

BB: Complete bullshit.

01:00:51 --> 01:01:19

Jon: Can't believe John schooled you in English, though. better believe it but no um I love this it's interesting though because the more I'm listening to it I'm not necessarily sure I mean it definitely could be Devo related that was my first thing it's like oh we got a secret we'll tell you later got a secret I'm like that's Devo they're gonna tell us they're finally gonna tell us oh no way but they're specifically talking like he talks about the senate I think we're gonna do well and then it's in reference to the house somehow yeah and it's a secret I just don't understand what it could be I don't know

01:01:23 --> 01:01:55

BB: So would this have any... Do you think there's anything he's saying that could have to do with what you and Kyle in particular often bring up about the 14th Amendment and some of the counter plans that you think the congress has in their pocket to try to stop Trump from coming back in like (Jon: that would be interesting) is this him talking about a reverse like we've got we've got a reverse uno card to what you guys think is your deployment I mean

01:01:41 --> 01:02:36

Jon: we've been talking for a while now about jamie raskin I think he first brought this up at a round table well actually got first got brought up last year in 2023 during the colorado stuff when they tried to get him off a ballot. But Jamie Raskin in February was at this roundtable conference thing and talking to people, and he said, well, if we have to, we'll use the 14th Amendment, Section 3, and we'll just not say he can be president, somebody who's been charged with insurrection. well I wonder what if what if they do steal it from Trump okay and but we have enough down ballot votes that we can do our own third section 3 14th Amendment on Kamala somehow to make Trump right like I don't know that's that's weird I can't imagine what other secret it can't be that

01:02:37 --> 01:03:55

BB: Yeah, because we've talked... I mean, who knows? But we've talked about... We've tried to game all these things out, all these different scenarios. They steal it for Kamala. They're not successful, etc. But with any of our theorizing, I always try to start with the end point which is okay. We agree that the point of Trump not exposing this stuff sooner and patriots by extension was because of you know an awakening era and awakening I think implies unification. It's actually going back to our last topic is one of the reasons I'm so personally fascinated with the Trump JFK stuff because I see that as a as a potential mass unification point like a multi-generational bipartisan unification point uh that we could have in the us. Any optics of Trump being installed into power I have a hard time seeing as being a unifying storyline just where we're at right now. That could change based on circumstances. Maybe it will get so crazy in a good way that Democrats are like, this is nuts. Trump is the rightful president. But I've always kind of gone away from Trump gets installed by taking out their leadership.

01:03:56 --> 01:04:30

Jon: You know, what if... Okay, I mean, who knows what the secret is, right? We're, again, totally speculating, but I'm just thinking about some other things. Somebody in the chat had a comment about, you know, watermarks on the 2020 ballots that would nullify 2020 congressional appointees. That's an interesting thought because... If they do have proof that not only 2020 was stolen, but maybe 2018, there were some down ballot steals 2022. Like, what if they have proof of some of these Democratic Congress people in the House or whatever that aren't supposed to be there? And so they get removed. I mean, that just seems too good to be true.

01:04:30 --> 01:04:38

BB: I know this. We've been seeing we're like we're like abused. I know where we we don't want to get our hopes up.

01:04:38 --> 01:04:40

Jon: But that doesn't sound like the hose. That can't be it.

01:04:41 --> 01:05:20

BB: something well actually speaking of the hose perfect. you know Chris always talks about we're begging to get the hose again I think his sentiment makes sense in terms of what he's saying and um I actually realized this in a text group with a couple of my cousins three of my cousins texted me after the rogan interview They'll text me occasionally about political stuff individually. But they were texting about the Rogan interview. And these guys are Trump guys. One of them is former military. Like one of them has read the drops and stuff like that. And one of them is more normie. But like they're not total normies. (Jon: Did they read my series?) One of them has.

01:05:20 --> 01:05:21

Jon: Really?

01:05:21 --> 01:07:50

BB: But yeah. But the what was kind of concerning to me was making me think of Chris is that they were like, oh, do you think this is going to push Trump over the top against Kamala? And my response was sort of like, are we talking as if this is a close election? and Trump needs rogan because that implies to me that um we do need the hose in some form but I think Patrick had said this in a private chat the other day and I've long agreed with Patrick despite all my switzerlanding of like I try to game all the scenarios um I do think that what I'm most committed to about November 5th is that a simple repeat of November 2020 is absolutely absurd if that's the plan. I'm not saying it's not going to be stolen, but if it is stolen, the story is going to be different. It's either going to be an immediate remedy, which sounds like a too good to be true scenario, or I think what Patrick had pointed out in that conversation was, if we start getting much more immediate disclosure publicly of theft, of this state is stealing, of there's charges, there's arrests being made. Because remember, this thing is state by state, right? We talk about a national election, but it's not. There's 50 elections going on. So all you need is a few of these states to have these massive scandals breaking the night or the week or the month of the election that puts the whole thing into question. And I think we knew that that stuff was happening in November 2020. But it was just pushed under the rug by the media. But there were no arrests being made. There were no actual charges being levied or anything like that. This time around, the reason I don't think it can be the same thing isn't because I don't want it to be. It's because if we're looking at an awakening era, it's not going to work. It isn't going to work. Because my conversations with normies, these guys are Trump guys. They don't If you give them no pathway and you're just like, hey, your votes don't matter. Well, guess what? They're just not going to vote. They're not going to vote and they're not going to do anything about the state of the country. They're just going to go to work on Monday. So it's a hose of that nature is only going to work for people like us who are already activated and are already trying to make the country better. That's kind of how I see it.

01:07:50 --> 01:10:30

Jon: see I just don't know because and this is where I was kind of talking about earlier with what what factors have changed from 2020 to 2024 in terms of like Trump had massive support he had all this momentum and all these things COVID was was there obviously some people still pretend it's there but it's not I mean there are things that have changed I think the biggest thing that has changed is the actual support that's behind him I i believe Trump had like 60 of the country in 2020 maybe maybe a little less than that I don't know because there's just that many apathetic people it's not that they didn't it's more like they didn't care. (BB: yeah) you know what I mean this time around I i mean based on the stuff we're seeing it feels it feels like he's got like 80 85 of of the country that's like willing to actually publicly support this I mean it's just huge the feeling is a little different this time and so in terms of like the hose again it would have to be different because we've been through it but there's been there's gonna be 30 40 50 million more people that haven't been through that yet and when you couple that with us that's a naturally different response and like everybody feels that way the media can't get away with that. nobody can get away with it. but this also ties in the the early voting stuff because we were talking about last night's Power Hour. you know because of the early voting they're not going to be able to get away with like are they gonna say dems voted on election day that's what they're gonna have to say but honestly in order they're gonna have to use the machines now like before they use mail on ballots they're gonna have to use the machines much more heavily if they're gonna steal it if they're gonna actually do it they're gonna have to use the machines much more heavily on election day to switch the votes and it's gonna be that much more obvious that there's some weird going on and maybe that's maybe that's the exposure but we need something to get rid of these machines like right I think that's the sticking point for a lot of like you know I don't want to speak for Chris but like for myself I don't know how we get there but I know we need to and Trump's going to at some point fix our election system because it's that bad it needs to go in order for him to truly give the country back to us I don't think he can do it With like status quo. I just win an election. We don't we don't win the house in the Senate, whatever He already tried to do it. I don't know if he can do it I don't have confidence he can do it if he's just elected with the same fraudulent system. Gets in there and tries to do it while he's in office I'm not I'm just not confident in that and that's why I think we need something prior to in order to get it switched before he's even back in there because then he doesn't fight anything But but I don't know like this is just speculation game theory shit. I have no idea.

01:10:30 --> 01:13:03

BB: I I basically 100% agree with how you just laid that out. And I agree with Chris. I agree with... That's why sometimes it comes off like I'm disagreeing of saying I don't think we can have the same thing again. I'm not saying I don't think we can have a stolen election. I expect a stolen election. I don't think they're mutually exclusive. This is something that I don't think a lot of people talk about enough. They look at the election as binary, right? Or they look at the scenario as binary, right? They're like, either we overwhelm the fraud, Trump gets back in, or they steal it again. I think it's entirely possible and could even be the move from a mass awakening perspective where we do have the kind of red wave that would be this huge catharsis moment. It would feel super good, right? And the election is absolutely flooded with fraudulent votes again and attempts to steal. When you look at Trump's cease and desist letters, we think of that, we default to going, they're gonna steal it again. That's why he's putting this out. They're gonna try to steal it again. But I firmly agree with Chris, with you, that It can't just be, we overwhelmed the fraud. And it's funny, speaking to that text group earlier, my response that the three guys were going back and forth being like, yeah, man, he's going to dwarf her. It's going to be a red wave, blah, blah, blah. And I kind of had a, I'm seen as the cynic in normie circles, right? We're on Badlands. They're like, you're so positive. And in normie circles, I'm the cynic, I got in there and I was like, yeah, well, it doesn't really matter as long as we have this election system. And one of them left the chat to text me directly and was like, do you really think they're gonna steal it again? And I said exactly what you did, like what Chris has been saying for four years now, if we don't change the election system, none of it matters. Going back to the Rogan interview, my favorite thing, aside from the JFK stuff, is that when Rogan brought up the election fraud stuff and Trump kept trying to dance around it, Trump did say, I owe it to the American people to give them free and fair elections. And that shows that however the scenario plays out, it's not going to be the case where Trump just overwhelms the fraud and we just move forward. It can't be the case. I think there's going to be tons of fraud. I think it's going to be a mass controversy. But when I say I don't think we're going to get the same thing, I don't see us just be like, yep, we're going to go into a Kamala Harris hose administration again and just do this for four more years.

01:13:03 --> 01:13:56

Jon: No, I don't think that's going to happen either. And this comes back to some of the devolution stuff, too. We've talked about this so many times. I don't think Trump would have walked away unless he cemented his return, right? I think that's even the exact way I phrased it all this time. He wouldn't have walked away unless he had his return to office cemented. And it's really difficult for me to imagine a scenario where that return involves winning an election in a fraudulent system like this. Like, how is he going to be able to put all of his chips into that basket? Be like, yep, I'm going to I'm going to walk away. We'll we'll leave the keys to the kingdom, to the Biden administration. We'll protect some things in the background guardrails, devolution. But the way I'm going to get back in is I'm going to rely on the country voting for me in a massive landslide. I just can't. There's too many variables at play there for that to be it. There's got to be more. There's got to be more. That's where my baseline thought process comes from.

01:13:57 --> 01:15:27

BB: And I think I've said this on the Power Hours recently, but I think it was October 6th. I just re-looked at the article again. Trump said, this is a mandate election. I need the mandate. And he has never said that before. And of course, I like it because I say that all the time. But to me, it's... Yeah. But to me, it's signal, right? It makes sense. It perfectly matches the conversation we are having where we acknowledge everybody in this community acknowledges that Trump is the rightful president of the United States. He was. He should be right now. He should be again in the future. That doesn't matter if we have a fraudulent election system. So why is Donald Trump talking about the public mandate? To me, it goes to part of the reason he's doing these blue state mega rallies in 2024. They have metrics. They know what that tipping point is. Earlier, you're like, is it 80%? Whatever it is, Brett Beier was saying 79% of the country thinks it's going in the wrong direction under the establishment. Is that a little calm there of what we're at? They know what we're at. And I think it's less about getting 80% of the votes. I think it's much more about we need 80% of the country fully on board with the Trump agenda so that he can do what is necessary to fix our election system without the kind of unrest that we would have had that you've talked about avoiding civil war in the past.

01:15:27 --> 01:16:42

Jon: it's the the switching of the apathy. we had a large majority of the country apathetic to Trump basically having the election stolen from him. they didn't care. there's whatever maybe it'll be less drama now from politics side but this time around like that apathy needs to be on like those people need to be this comes back to what I said before Trump Trump walked away in 2020 to avoid a civil war but this time he's not going to allow them to get away with stealing it to also avoid that civil war like it's that might be one of the my favorite things I've said because I think it's however this plays out Trump is not going to let us actually go down a path where Kamala Harris is the president that that doesn't happen that won't happen but how we get from where we're at now to that point of trumping inaugurated with all the systems that they still have in place that need to be removed it's a huge question mark and that's why it's this is what's on everybody's mind everybody's worried about this and it's like some people don't want to hear that some bad things might it might be shitty for a month or so we don't know how this nobody knows how this is going to play out nobody knows. it's going to be fascinating to watch Gart's going to be a blast because we're going to be in the thick of it at that point but nobody knows guys nobody has the answers right now

01:16:43 --> 01:17:13

BB: I think it's actually a credit to the audience, the fact that that's our first sellout for a Gart. I didn't know how it was going to go because I'm like, are people going to be too anxious or are they going to wait to see if it's going to be good news or bad news? But then it's the perfect thing where this audience wants to be around each other to celebrate or to be around each other to handle whatever bad shit is going on too. So it makes sense.

01:17:13 --> 01:17:17

Jon: It's going to be a great, great Gart. So get your virtual tickets, guys. Get your virtual tickets.

01:17:17 --> 01:17:19

BB: I think there are still some single days.

01:17:19 --> 01:17:41

Jon: Yeah, there are single days, Saturday and Sunday, or you can get them coupled up. If you can't join us in person, definitely get your virtual ticket, but our full calendar year for next year is out. The next conference is going to be in March in Vegas, so I think that'd be another well-attended one. Vegas is pretty easy to get to for most people, so it should be good.

01:17:43 --> 01:18:11

BB: yeah we won't get destroyed by California, Taxes in Vegas too so that's yeah that helps and (Jon: I can double we can double our profit while we're there. it'll be so simple) our zero percent pro just um all right one more one more little clip from the rally that I wanted to bring up I thought it got my sort of operation warp speed and switch theory and all that kind of stuff, Jimmy's rustling.

This will be America's new golden age

01:18:12 --> 01:18:15

BB: Trump has said this stuff before, you guys have seen it, but the way he frames it.

01:18:18 --> 01:18:32

Trump: This will be America's new golden age. It's gonna happen quickly too, very quickly. Every problem facing us can be solved, but now the fate of our nation is in your hands.

01:18:34 --> 01:19:23

BB: know that's that stuff he said but I mean and uh it was preceded by Elon Musk gave uh speech tonight and he was talking about a lot of the same stuff he was talking about government efficiency he's gonna cut two trillion dollars of spending immediately he's gonna you know mimic Javier Malay down there in Argentina and just "afuera" everything uh but to me this is a perfect example of the Trump kind of bicameral speaking style when he's talking to normie maga and Americans who are strung out and they don't pay attention to the stuff we do he's saying hey hope right things are going to get better and it's going to get better before you know it But if you believe what he's saying, literally, it's all the stuff we talk about. How could you make a promise like that?

01:19:23 --> 01:19:23

Jon: Right.

01:19:23 --> 01:19:41

BB: That's what most Americans are thinking, like even ones that are going to vote for him. And it's the stuff we talk about all the time of chip sacks and energy deals and tariffs. And it's like he's he's talking about warp speed. He's talking about flipping a switch and putting us into the golden age pretty quick.

01:19:42 --> 01:21:06

Jon: What's fascinating about that too, what happened in his first term and what we've gone through these last four years, it's already been a pretty clear distinction on the two different types of, not just presidencies, but people's livelihoods, right? like things were just better under Trump than they are now and outside the COVID stuff. But think about like what he's been saying he's going to do in these interviews and some of the stuff we know he's been like lining up behind the scenes with the chips act and the the switch theory and everything if they do get rid of like all this they could clean out the government get rid of all that wasteful spending get all this manufacturing stuff here implement the tariffs like by the time Trump leaves office in 2028 we could be like we could theoretically have our debt paid off. like they they bloated our government very slowly and incrementally like you hardly even noticed it year over year but they've been doing it for a century maybe. who knows how long. but it took a long time for it to get as big and inefficient and corrupt as it is like he could wipe that all out the second term and Who's ever going to vote for the status quo again after that? When things are that much different and better under a Make America First Great Again platform, nobody's going to vote away from that anymore when they see how good it is. But you need to fix the election system first.

01:21:07 --> 01:22:34

BB: And this is where there are all these long-term psyops that the deep state uses. One of the biggest ways they use psyops I think is linguistic psyops. One of the ones I think about is the concept of inflation. We all know the rug pull boys, everybody in this community understands the evils of the Federal Reserve, central banking, debt based monetary system. We all know fiat is why we have so many of the problems that we do. And we know that it's because of inflation. But some of these linguistic tricks they use are really sinister. So one of the things you'll see economists, even ones who are supposedly praising Trump policies etc they will talk about the rate of inflation and how the rate of inflation is changing right? And, it's like all you have to do from a first principles perspective is apply five-year-old like childlike reason to the situation and you'll see how screwed up it all is when you talk about the debt ballooning when inflation is down They don't mean that inflation has gone negative. They mean the rate at which things are getting more expensive is slower this month than it was last month. And if you applied that framework to any other situation, like let's say you're on fire. Like I light your pants on fire.

01:22:35 --> 01:22:36

Jon: Rude, first of all.

01:22:37 --> 01:22:46

BB: It would be rude, right? The Federal Reserve, Jerome Powell comes into your house right now and lights your pants on fire. And then you're like, Jerome, bro.

01:22:47 --> 01:22:47

Jon: How rude.

01:22:47 --> 01:22:49

BB: You fucking lit my pants on fire, man.

01:22:49 --> 01:22:50

Jon: I was going to win.

01:22:50 --> 01:22:54

BB: You can't do that. First of all, it's illegal. It's a crime. Somebody should be arrested. Damn it.

01:22:54 --> 01:22:56

Jon: Not a perfect time to end it. Yeah.

01:22:57 --> 01:23:19

BB: You can't do it, first of all, right? But if he did... His argument to you about why you should stop freaking out is that 10 seconds later, maybe the rate at which you're on fire has decreased because 2% of your body has already been burned beyond recognition. So now only 98% of your body can be burned, right?

01:23:19 --> 01:23:21

Jon: That's insane.

01:23:21 --> 01:23:38

BB: Yeah. Then when you're fully engulfed in flames, technically, this is why I like this analogy, and technically your potential for being even more on fire beyond that continues to go down. which is pretty much how the US inflation system.

01:23:38 --> 01:23:59

Jon: It's so stupid. It's like, okay, from January inflation went from 5% to 6% in February, went from 6% to 6.6%. Then they say inflation is down because instead of it going up 1%, it only went up 0.6%. That it's such a stupid mathematical, but they get away with it. Nobody calls an out on it. Nobody.

01:24:01 --> 01:24:12

BB: Well, That's why it's got to have, as the Rug Pull boys talk about all the time, as Trump has talked about, we need currency changes to really undo this stuff.

Boosts

01:24:13 --> 01:24:18

BB: I will grab a couple of boosts from last week and then we'll do our next topic.

01:24:19 --> 01:24:21

Jon: Awesome. I got that tapper clip ready to go.

01:24:21 --> 01:24:23

BB: Oh, yeah. Is that about?

01:24:23 --> 01:24:30

Jon: It's media stuff. It has to do with the media and we can't just let them be like, we never did that.

01:24:31 --> 01:25:10

BB: yeah all right we'll open we'll open with that okay uh amy v drk I think I actually got that one uh meme meme ray 1776 sent 47 over boomer here been watching Badlands since its beginning defected as a much wash every mush must watch every monday morning with my coffee Trump is Batman I know you're right mr truth bomb is producing a documentary too you guys give me peace in a crazy world That should be pretty cool. Yeah, I want to eventually write a whole series on the Trump-Batman thing, but we've pretty much already done it.

01:25:11 --> 01:25:16

Jon: Well, if he's just redoing the Batman movies, isn't the series already written and out there and produced?

01:25:17 --> 01:25:27

BB: Disclosure, guys. I wrote the Batman movies. This has all been part of the op from the beginning. There are people who think that we are... I think recently we were called Navy SEALs, right?

01:25:27 --> 01:25:29

Jon: You're so happy about that. Is that the first time that's...

01:25:31 --> 01:26:47

BB: happens pretty often like it's hard to keep track. just I walk down the street people are like is that a seal? (Jon: yeah I'm sure like I think they're actually like is that a seal like the clapping) very good uh Melissa s 35 bucks thanks for mentioning the Dark Knight ask pic of pittsburgh on your last show I'm the Melissa ass that sent it to you when I saw it I immediately thought of you BB I see the world in a whole new light now thanks to you and Kyle and badlands. Every everywhere Melissa looks she just sees Dark Night comms just going about her day just Dark Night analogs and I think that's a good way to live your life actually you'll uh you'll be in a good place. Just seeing if any new ones came in. Yeah, we got a couple actually. Awake in Mass, 25 bucks. Thank you for great and entertaining shows. We are having a meetup for the New England group on November 3rd at Jack's Abbey in Framingham at 12 noon. Hoping some New Englanders can make it to energize us for the election shenanigans. all right people jack's abbey at framingham in framingham at noon November 3rd I went to school I went to college there and uh jack's abbey beer is damn good

01:26:47 --> 01:27:27

Jon: you went to college at the bar in the bar (BB: yep that's what we called it we were just binge drinking now I went to college in framingham) cool yeah guys these these badlander meetups that everybody's doing like you guys are awesome. It warm it honestly like warms my heart to see that you guys are like taking this upon yourselves and creating these little groups and your own little communities outside of here which is exactly what we want so while you are not officially connected to Badlands media we do not endorse or any of your whatever like whatever liability things I need to say there so that we are not liable for whatever happens. love. (BB: this exact clip will be played in court) yeah yes I do not condone or endorse any of your activities but I'm proud of y'all but we love it yeah

01:27:28 --> 01:27:52

BB: It'll be like, as my client said, whatever legal stuff I need to be saying right now, I just imply that I've said it. I think it's foolproof. They could be plotting insurrections against us. I always keep that in the back of my mind. I want you guys to have fun, but if you're fucking around and trying to overthrow us, then I don't want your meetups to be fun.

01:27:52 --> 01:27:57

Jon: Then you've got to come to Burning Bright's meetup because he's been trying to do that for like two years. And he needs some help because it's not been going well for him.

01:27:58 --> 01:28:06

BB: That's what Gart 8? Plymouth. That's what Gart 8 is all about. That's the Brightlands Gart.

01:28:07 --> 01:28:07

Jon: We'll see about that.

01:28:07 --> 01:28:14

BB: I know the person who's doing the graphics these days, so maybe I can start to slowly finagle the branding.

01:28:14 --> 01:28:18

Jon: Yeah, and I pay the person who does the graphics these days.

01:28:18 --> 01:28:37

BB: Son of a bitch. All right, one more. Lionheart sent $100 over tonight. Much appreciated. Hey guys, started watching Hysteria on Peacock, loosely based on the satanic panic of the 80s. Episode one is a small red pill as one of the characters is a con theorist and is truth bombing his friends on the evil lying media. God bless.

01:28:38 --> 01:28:40

Jon: What was the show?

01:28:40 --> 01:28:41

BB: Hysteria on Peacock.

01:28:43 --> 01:28:44

Jon: Never heard of it.

01:28:45 --> 01:29:54

BB: They did a whole subplot on the Satanic Panic in Stranger Things Season 4, which I like that show, but it is interesting that the Satanic Panic stuff comes back into the zeitgeist, and I think it's a response to the Pizzagate conspiracies and that stuff's pretty dark when you look into like obviously we weren't John and I were not around during the satanic panic but (Jon: no) it was pretty obvious that people were figuring some shit out so the media just turned them all into lunatics who thought that people were in satanic cults and it turned out that they were right (Jon: it's like basically the is that what happened with the witches back in salem back in the day pretty much same thing) see yeah like I wonder though We've all kind of universally accepted that the witches were the good guys. So is that the inversion? Were they actually witches? And we got them? I mean, I've kept that in the back of my mind. Maybe they were up to some shenanigans. Like, for example, maybe they didn't make the sandwich right.

01:29:55 --> 01:30:11

Jon: yeah but there's other I mean I understand Burning out the steak maybe maybe they burnt some steak maybe they burnt a steak and it's like that is unacceptable now this is what you get (BB: that fits that's probably why they call it that that's why they call it that I think that's why) yep okay now we're now we figured it out

01:30:13 --> 01:30:34

BB: I hope Plymouth Patriot 6157 is going to the Plymouth Guard. I would assume that they are. All right. That's all the boost for now. If you guys want to support any of the individual shows, including this one, Badlandsmedia.tv slash boost. Is it boost singular? Boost. Yes, it is.

01:30:34 --> 01:31:00

Jon: Yeah, thatlensme.tv. Click on support and then boosts and pick your show. And yeah, it is actually, while we appreciate Rumble and Rumble rants are great, the creators keep more of the money if you do the boosts. Because we only withhold the processing fees on those, and they get the full whatever's left. It's like 90-some percent, 95, 97, 98. I don't even remember. With Rumble, they keep 20%.

JD Vance roasts Jake Tapper on CNN, Q drop 32

01:31:03 --> 01:31:32

BB: is what it is but uh yeah appreciate you guys supporting however you do all right let's uh let's lead in our second topic pretty similar to the first but we're just gonna we want to talk about the media we touched on this on friday night when Patrick had asked an interesting question um but yeah let's lead it with the with this (Jon: what did he ask again) well he he basically Patrick has a low opinion of Joe Rogan and considers him controlled opposition, or at least has been controlled opposition.

01:31:32 --> 01:31:34

Jon: To be fair, he has a low opinion of virtually everybody.

01:31:35 --> 01:32:27

BB: Yeah. And I don't think that that's a ridiculous opinion to hold. I've gone, it's one I've waffled back and forth on. I don't know where, I don't know if Rogan's, you know, I used to really like him a lot and then I soured on him and now I'm coming back around. But I, you know, he had said, Rogan set the interview up in an extremely pro-Trump manner, right? I didn't expect him to go after Trump or anything, even if he's a regime guy, even if Rogan is a CIA guy. However, he set him up by saying, everything the media says about you is bullshit. And that's how he introduced Trump, right? So Patrick was kind of saying, okay, if we've got these media figures and these regime figures, why are we seeing some of these turns going on? And I've kind of got some of my theories on it, but I think the Tapper clip is pretty...

01:32:27 --> 01:33:34

Jon: Yeah, I mean, the reason I want to play this and one of the things I want to discuss at some point is like, we can't let these people get away with what they've done because I think if we do, we could find ourselves in a situation similar to where we're at now, many years down the road. Like this is one of those things where if we're going to go through this, let's do it and do it right. And never allow ourselves to go through this and do this again. And one of the ways we do that is not allowing the media as it is now to exist anymore. And that includes some of the alternative media people. And like, it we got to get to a point where we're on 11 playing field with everybody and the people with actual integrity and the truth as much as they know like and I'm not saying like we're even the best at it we try our best but we may not even be the best at it but those are the type of people that need to somehow make their way to the top we can't be having the Joe Rogans who are afraid to speak things and the Tim Pools they cannot be our thought leaders know what I mean and like so we cannot have yeah we need to be able to compete with them on a free market that's yes yeah and like watch this clip this clip is just fascinating

01:33:36 --> 01:33:42

JD Vance: Ask yourself a basic question about network integrity. You guys talked about the Russia hoax nonstop.

01:33:42 --> 01:33:47

Jake Tapper: The FBI was investigating it. The FBI was investigating it, so we covered them.

01:33:47 --> 01:34:03

JD Vance: And so you took the words of unnamed FBI agents and put them on your network as if they were the gospel truth. You did it again and again. A viewer of your network would have believed that Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin conspired in 2016. That was totally and preposterously false. What you just said is false.

01:34:04 --> 01:34:08

Jake Tapper: We covered an FBI investigation. I don't know why you want to talk about the FBI investigation.

01:34:08 --> 01:34:19

JD Vance: You covered it in a way that gave credence to anonymous sources' accusations. You did it yourself. Your network did it, Jake. But again, can we talk about the issues that Americans care most about?

01:34:19 --> 01:34:28

Jake Tapper: I'm talking about things that Donald Trump has said. If you have an issue with whether or not he's talking about the economy enough, That's between you and your running mate. I'm talking about things he has said this week.

01:34:29 --> 01:34:48

JD Vance: Every single rally that he does, he talks about how he wants to unleash American energy so we can lower the cost of groceries. He talks about the fact that housing has become unaffordable. He talks about the wide open border, Jake. Kamala Harris and her allies, you know, it's interesting. Kamala Harris and her media allies, and I would put CNN in this category. They wouldn't. I'll tell you that.

01:34:48 --> 01:34:49

Jake Tapper: They wouldn't.

01:34:49 --> 01:35:00

JD Vance: Well, they should watch your network more because you guys seem to care more about Donald Trump's past, than the future of the American people. We're running this campaign on making of the American dream.

01:35:00 --> 01:35:05

Jake Tapper: I'm specifically asking about how Donald Trump is going to be president in the future should he win.

01:35:05 --> 01:35:38

JD Vance: And then we're being told that we're- He's gonna pursue economic policies that lower the cost of groceries and make life more affordable again. He talks about it every single day on the campaign trail, and so do I. What you're talking about is an anonymously sourced story where one guy- (Jake Tapper: Nothing anonymously sourced.) One guy who is a disgruntled employee- I told you, 10 people. Five other people pushed back against him and said that what he said was dishonest. So why don't we talk about the policy that's affecting American citizens and not what Donald Trump allegedly said, according to one guy who's pissed off because he got fired by Donald Trump?

01:35:40 --> 01:35:41

Jon: I mean, damn.

01:35:42 --> 01:36:45

BB: JD, you know, like we opinions have varied on JD and it's been good to map his origins and everything and keep all of that stuff in mind. Not that I think it's nefarious. I mean, I'm somebody who looks at connections to Peter Thiel and and that kind of group and think that it's probably more good than bad. But although I understand the alternative, but man, seeing him, seeing him in these exchanges I get it. uh you know seeing him on a stage and giving a speech as he did I think he does well but it's so vanilla to me compared to Trump that I'm not that into it. I'm not that into watching him do a campaign rally but seeing him in debates and in back and forth conversations. he's really really good at it and you know like he comes off firm, but not as a dick, right? So you can't really write him off because he's bringing receipts, just recalling receipts as he's going back and forth. And they're not used to that. They don't know how to handle it.

01:36:46 --> 01:37:53

Jon: Yeah, he's brilliant in those situations. And I've been one of those guys who've like questioned him as the selection. But I mean, looking at how he balances Trump and he's able to go on these networks where Trump doesn't need to, but he will and he'll push back and do it in a way that they can't even argue with him. He's absolutely right about what these people did, and they're flat out denying it. Jake Tapper, you could scroll his Twitter feed, and maybe I'll do this later and post some of this stuff. This guy was straight up, flat out, accusing Trump of colluding with Russia. Repeatedly. And he's going to come out and say, no, we didn't do that. We didn't do any of that. We didn't do any of that. That is total bullshit. And this is how they're going to do everything. They expect us to forget that he did that. or their network did that and when he's saying like when JD Vance said the comment about well you should watch your network sometime you know because they have been they just Brian Stelter went on a weekend meltdown a bender of a meltdown where he's so mad at the Washington Post for not endorsing Kamala Harris that it's like his world view has completely collapsed because of it it's it's fascinating to watch him go through this like I feel yeah I feel like I'm watching somebody fall apart at the seams

01:37:54 --> 01:37:58

BB: Yeah, and Tapper didn't look good, that initial. No. He looks kind of strung out.

01:37:58 --> 01:38:47

Jon: None of these guys do. But we cannot be apathetic to these people trying to get away with the, no, we didn't do that. Not only do we need to not watch them, like nobody should be watching these people, but we need to make sure that nobody ever forgets about what they did. And maybe Trump's already got a plan for that, too, because Trump himself has called the media the enemy of the people. He sends it at some of these FCC licenses from the CBS's and the ABC's. I saw somebody out there, I can't remember who it was, put out like a, it's time to open these licenses up and sell them to the highest bidder and hold them to actual benchmarks of truth. And you can't just say whatever you want and be partisan about it. I don't know what the answer is, but I got to imagine this is another one of those things that Trump doesn't have an answer for. But it's also on us to not get complacent with this shit either.

01:38:48 --> 01:43:14

BB: Yeah, and I think to that point, and going back to the Rogan comments that you had made, I think that there's a distinction between, you know, I don't want anybody deplatformed. I don't want people who don't talk about the right things to be deplatformed or anything like that. or removed from their positions just because they're pussies right like they don't want to talk about election fraud okay do your shows and just paper over election fraud and don't talk about it the problem is that the other side which is our side has not been allowed to be on the same battlefield as them so it's it's less about taking them off the battlefield it's about putting us on the battlefield and then they're gonna have to either leave it or their rhetoric is gonna have to change But to your point about people like Tapper or his ilk, the key word to me that was kind of seeded into everybody's minds during the Q drops is knowingly, the word knowingly. That is what I always think about when it comes to this dilemma. Besides the fact that, as you said, we need to stop watching the media, that's already well underway, especially when they don't have any scandals to cover their hemorrhaging support. The fact that, you know, if you even look to us, it's kind of hilarious that the Rogan podcast is super normie to us. But keep in mind, to a lot of normies, that's like a renegade thing. And the fact that Trump went on there and did a three-hour interview, it's a paradigm shift. It's going to mark a paradigm shift where a presidential candidate right before the election is on a podcast on YouTube for three hours. And he's been doing it for months, right? That's going to go further and further. But there's a drop that I always think of when it comes to what I think will happen with some of these media people and I think it goes along with the knowingly sort of thing. you want to share my screen here um all right Q drop 32 This was in response to an anon. I forget what the question had been, but I think it was something, you know, about when did the arrests happen? You know, this is an early, early Q drop. This is from the first week of Q drop. So we're coming up on a seven-year delta here, November 1st, 2017. Maybe one day, but it cannot go slow. The initial wave will be fast and meaningful. It will send a signal to others immediately and you'll see the tide turn. Not even the MSM can hide. And rest assured, some will be jailed as deep cover agents. Wow. So that sounds extremely sensational. Of course, at the time, it was impossible to even imagine that. But this is how I'd frame this section. we're kind of talking about how we've been pointing out on various shows and even privately like, man, Anderson Cooper went in the paint pretty hard against Kamala Harris, but then Brian Stelter's going nuts about Trump and Tapper's trying to tiptoe backwards, but Rachel Maddow is going further in. The way I rationalize this is I look at that drop and I think that what we're seeing is the ones who knowingly, meaning like all of them knowingly, all of them knew they were lying, I think. The difference is some of these people at these three-letter networks are very literally Intel assets. Those ones know that they are going to be jailed for being deep cover insurgents peddling false information to the American people. The other ones that were just handling the information they might think that they're going to get away with it and so they're kind of trying to rebrand I think. That's kind of how I see it. I think that the more you know that those who scream the loudest it's another infamous Q-ism those ones are probably the ones that were in meetings about what sort of things they were going to deploy against Trump next and I think a lot of people that are just sitting around the circular desk at CNN they're useful idiots right they're ideologues the Chris Cuomo's of the world I don't think he's a deep cover agent I think Chris was a charismatic dude who was good at selling whatever the machine put in front of him and he didn't care what it was and it could be the Tappers one of those guys too

01:43:15 --> 01:44:24

Jon: Yeah, and maybe the strings have been cut in a lot of ways in terms of the organizational methods of some of these people, and they're just choosing to respond how they see fit. Some people are trying to walk it back, thinking they'll get away with it. Anderson Cooper and Rachel Maddow getting off differently you know what I mean like Rachel Maddow's having a meltdown Joe Scarborough is having a meltdown Anderson Cooper thinks he can save face but I see them like if there were any journalists that were going to end up going to actual prison for treason and peddling misinformation on purpose stuff like that like it'd be those guys they're all in the same boat they're just reacting differently so I wonder I don't know like I agree with you said earlier too about like I don't I don't want anybody to be de-platformed I just want an actual decentralized media where everybody's on the same playing field and has access to the same like viewership whether or not people choose to watch you that's up to them right And maybe it's up to people in our audience and us to do our best to call out the bullshit when we see it. But I would never want anybody to actually be deplatformed. But that doesn't mean I'm not going to call Tim Pool a faggot when he is one.

01:44:24 --> 01:45:32

BB: Right. And the only exception to that is why I bring up deep cover agents. Because this stuff can sound... In 2017, to normies, it still sounds cartoonish. But... They have the sauce, right? We're moving, I think, into a period of disclosure. Trump talks about disclosure all the time. The drops are laced with disclosure. They're talking about like the American people need to understand what happened here. Now, how much disclosure are we going to get? I don't know. I think people like us are going to be left a little bit unsatisfied by some of it. But when it comes to I think it is. I think it's of the utmost importance that normies understand that some of the talking heads that they watched and trusted for years were not just ideologues who disagreed with Trump. They were literally paid disinformation agents. Like those people are traitors those people are criminals whereas you know to the Tim Pools of the world they're just Pussies like that's the, that's the way I'd put it. They're dishonest. They look for, you know, they're, they're above money, money and platform above all else.

01:45:33 --> 01:45:36

Jon: Patrick, Patrick calls them money grubbing power bottoms.

01:45:37 --> 01:46:09

BB: That's he, he has a way with words. Yeah. Speaking of media turns though, speaking of Chris Cuomo, I saw this come across my feed and it's pretty hilarious. You know, you just start to just draw like the dodgeball lines, like you're picking teams and dodgeball and see which sides, like you said, Anderson Cooper, maybe he thinks Anderson Vanderbilt thinks he's going to get forgiven. So apparently Chris Cuomo thinks that, uh, He's going to be on Noah's Ark.

01:46:09 --> 01:46:31

Jon: Before we listen to this, do you remember he went on Tucker? And Tucker is one that I've always questioned, too. I know he's with Trump now. He's like he's saying some things. I think I saw somebody said he said tonight, like Trump freed him from lying. But you got to remember, his dad was also CIA and he applied. He's admittedly applied to the CIA and got declined. only to become the most famous journalist in the world.

01:46:32 --> 01:46:33

BB: As Putin pointed out.

01:46:33 --> 01:46:48

Jon: Yeah. I don't know, guys. That's one of those we'll wait and see. But he interviewed him, and it was a weird scissor fest, honestly. I don't understand the point of that interview. It was to almost save Chris Cuomo's career.

Chris Cuomo rehabilitation tour

01:46:49 --> 01:48:05

BB: yeah there's like a the the the term that comes into my mind is rehabilitation. like there's a Chris Cuomo rehabilitation tour going on and you're absolutely right that Tucker is playing a huge role in it. Chris is trying to do his part Chris Cuomo is trying to do his part to rehabilitate his image and we don't know what these things but I do wonder if I see Cuomo as more of the useful idiot variety. I don't think he believed the stuff he was saying about Donald Trump, which makes him a dishonest buffoon. But there's a difference between that and the type of people that have been... that were part of fabricating these things um the media machine kind of did turn on Chris Cuomo at a certain point in time so he strikes me as somebody who he marched in lockstep with them when it was good for his bank account and but he was not inside, right? like he was not really he's not in the club it doesn't seem like he doesn't seem to be invited to the same parties uh that doesn't mean I like him but it's just there's probably a pretty big cross-section of how deep the betrayal goes with these kind of figures

01:48:06 --> 01:48:26

Jon: and one thing to keep in mind too. um Trump used to always say the media is the enemy of the people. Now his phrase has switched to just the "enemy within". The media is part of that enemy. And I think it's also like he shifted that because it now includes members of the government. I mean, it always did, but now that's where it's going. But anyway, let's play this.

01:48:26 --> 01:48:34

BB: So this is just Chris Cuomo describing what he sees as the media's inability to understand why people vote for Donald Trump.

01:48:35 --> 01:49:28

Chris Cuomo: Stop thinking that the people who support Trump are like Trump, that they speak like Trump, that they act like Trump. They don't. They want to hire Trump to do a dirty job. They want him to be a virus to the political corpus. They want him to disrupt, to destroy, to demean those that they disrespect and dislike, the system that they distrust and despise. They want someone to do what they believe has been done to them and that they cannot do themselves. That's why they don't care that he exhibits terrible behavior, because they're putting him into a terrible place. If you're sending somebody into the jungle, do you really care if they're a savage? You see what I'm saying? And you have to understand it that way. You may not agree, you may not accept, you may not like, but that's what it is.

01:49:29 --> 01:49:30

Patric: Motherfucker.

01:49:32 --> 01:49:50

BB: It's an interesting clip in light of what we just discussed, but it's also interesting because, leaving Chris Cuomo aside, Word for word, his exchange there was my rationale for first becoming a supporter of Trump.

01:49:50 --> 01:49:54

Jon: It reminds me of the Michael Moore clip from back in the day.

01:49:55 --> 01:50:30

BB: Yes, exactly. That's exactly what I was thinking of the the most accidental campaign ad for Trump that we've ever seen. the Cuomo's campaign ad might be a little bit more intentional at this point in time the way he's trying to rebrand himself but that was my rationale early on I was a disillusioned democrat and um was not going to vote for Hillary Clinton was not going to vote for a communist and Bernie Sanders But I just thought Trump was a clown. I was like, he's the apprentice guy. I liked him from the MMA world and everything. But I started to dislike him when he was running because I'm like, come on, man, you're jumping the shark.

01:50:30 --> 01:50:32

Jon: You hate sharks.

01:50:33 --> 01:51:06

BB: Yeah, that's true. That's probably why. I don't like when people jump the shark. But I think it's interesting to see, like, it's one thing to have Anderson Cooper on stage and just, as you pointed out on Twitter, we're praising these people for just asking politicians questions, Brett Beier and Anderson Cooper. I agree with that. This Cuomo one is interesting because he's saying things that are much more direct about the rationale behind voting for Trump than a lot of these other guys are.

01:51:06 --> 01:51:44

Jon: was pandering and think about that Chris Cuomo got cut loose from CNN I don't know what stupid thing he did to do that but got cut loose and at some point these people like they know what they've been doing they know what they're a part of and they see the writing on the wall too and so that was that was straight up pandering to the Trump supporters because he wants what is going to be like he wants to build his audience for what's going to be the Trump presidency (BB: yeah) and this is the it's like good for you man but also off like what you put the country through for more than four years, you don't get forgiveness from You don't get forgiveness for that shit.

Chris Cuomo on ivermectin, strings cut

01:51:46 --> 01:52:27

BB: And I think it was... I just looked up his name to double check I was correct. But a few months ago, I saw somebody do exactly what you just said. That was Dave Smith. He's a known... He's been on Rogan's a few times, but he's like a... He's a famous libertarian. And... him and Cuomo among others were on this open mic type of thing. A conversation at an event and uh Cuomo was trying to distance himself from the reporting of cnn when he had been there and Smith did not let him have it he was like you were a part of that you pushed the covet you pushed Trump being hitler you you pushed all of that was it this one this is it

01:52:29 --> 01:52:38

Chris Cuomo: obviously there was so much talk that they don't want you to take ivermectin. Ivermectin is the way to go take it. Joe Rogan got better from ivermectin. And by the way, I don't like what people did to Joe Rogan about ivermectin.

01:52:39 --> 01:52:39

Dave Smith: You did it.

01:52:40 --> 01:52:40

Chris Cuomo: No, no.

01:52:41 --> 01:52:42

Dave Smith: Yes, you did.

01:52:42 --> 01:52:43

Chris Cuomo: Find the clips.

01:52:43 --> 01:52:46

Dave Smith: Dude, find the clips. You shamed Joe Rogan.

01:52:46 --> 01:52:46

Chris Cuomo: Find the clips.

01:52:46 --> 01:52:52

Dave Smith: You said he's taking horse dewormer. You and Don Lemon were chuckling at each other about it. I'll go find the clips. First of all, you just saw the clips.

01:52:53 --> 01:52:54

Chris Cuomo: I'm not chuckling. I'm listening to Don.

01:52:54 --> 01:53:03

Dave Smith: No, no, no. The clip I'm talking about that wasn't on there, and it's absolutely there. Oh, here, do we have it? Hold on, let's play the clip.

01:53:04 --> 01:53:08

Don Lemon: Injecting drugs for animals and horse.

01:53:08 --> 01:53:18

Chris Cuomo: And people telling them to. What person, you know, you talk about like, you know, cancel culture and who to shame. Ivermectin, a dewormer, really?

01:53:18 --> 01:53:19

Don Lemon: They are shaming themselves.

01:53:19 --> 01:53:22

Chris Cuomo: That's what it is. They're shaming themselves.

01:53:22 --> 01:53:31

Dave Smith: So you're taking a dewormer right now. This is a dewormer. Chris, you can't apologize for that. You weren't being clear that it was this, and you know that, dude. You're being so dishonest right now, man.

01:53:31 --> 01:53:31

Chris Cuomo: I'm not.

01:53:32 --> 01:53:33

Jon: That's amazing.

01:53:33 --> 01:54:02

BB: So exactly what you want. And this is this is what I have. I mean, it pisses people like Jon and I off. I think particularly efficient. It pisses the audience off. But, you know, when you're like when you're seeing people rebrand themselves in real time. Because to your point, they know what's coming. However it comes, they know what's coming and they see a pot of gold at the end of that rainbow. So they're trying to rebrand. But they're not going to be able to, I don't think.

01:54:02 --> 01:55:50

Jon: We should talk about that because I don't think people understand like doing what we do. We've been blessed with a platform. We have a great audience, great community that we've built. we try to like operate in a certain way for like I mean we just try to operate a certain way and stick to those the integrity that that we have right? like we have always tried to operate in a certain way and we want to continue operating on that path and we believe if we continue to do it that way. it doesn't matter how things work out eventually like we're gonna like. nothing else matter like we're going to be successful because people I think are drawn to integrity. there are people out there that haven't operated that way They knowingly don't operate that way. And then later on, they're like, okay, well, I'm gonna start doing things this way now without ever acknowledging the piss poor behavior that they had for a long time. And these are people like I've met, like I know some of these people who are totally full of shit, totally dishonest. Like they're clickbaity, they steal content, they straight up lie, they know something's wrong. Like people who operate very dishonest, they'll cry on stream to try to get people to buy into their bullshit. It just lies. People operate that way. There's a difference between people who operate like that and people who are just waking up. We can be forgiving to people who had no idea before and are just now starting to come to light, but we can't be forgiving of people who have operated in a very bad faith way previously. And are now trying to operate in good faith and pretend to operate. I don't even trust those moves either because I know who they are. If you operated that way before, you're doing this for not the right reasons. And whatever that is will eventually come to light too. But there's a difference here between people actually waking up that we can have open arms for and forgiveness for and people who are just operating in bad faith.

01:55:50 --> 01:57:29

BB: Yeah, and I think that's the key, you know, when you use the word forgiveness, even in personal life, it's often good to forgive somebody for yourself, you know, like to to just move on and not hold on to that stuff. But in terms of rekindling a relationship with somebody from the past, that in your mind is done wrong to you. forgiveness has to be a two-way street there has to be an acknowledgement of the wrongdoing like every human being understands this. You can forgive somebody and move on with your life but if they don't acknowledge the things they do you're not going to have them as part of that life that you move forward into and that's why I like that Dave Smith pointed out there I don't know a lot about him right I'm just in this in this specific example he didn't even really make it about the Ivermectin and what Chris Cuomo said he nailed Cuomo on the problem which is that when confronted with the direct evidence that what he was asserting in that one minute clip was complete he doesn't own it even then like he is standing in front of the evidence that is being shown to a studio audience and he still will not acknowledge what everybody is looking at. And that's why, to your point, they can't be forgiven. People like this, it's like, and I think, you know, if I want to keep the faith in people, people can see that. They're not going to be, you can't brand yourself as the Cuomos of the world, as the ultimate Trump Hunter, and then do an about face and expect people to, even normies, to glob on to the new branding. I don't think it's going to work.

01:57:30 --> 01:58:36

Jon: and that's the part like you nailed it there. that's the part that I hate is like you can't even acknowledge what you did was wrong. like at least if you did that I would I would maybe believe that you were actually trying to do the right thing now moving forward but without that it's totally void of any actual integrity to me and this is stuff that we've gone through per. like when we when we got accused by our friends of being Mossad for a good stretch there and like they they all just like left okay like well we could have at some point apologized and maybe maybe said like yeah there was never actually any evidence of any of that stuff sorry for putting you through months of and trying to ruin Badlands when you start and all that stuff. no they're just like they just completely pretend like it never happened and then like we get accused sometimes like why don't you ever share these guys were like why don't you ever do like why don't you bring them on? it's like we've moved on we moved past it we actually never threw any shade back we've been on our path this whole time but like we're not gonna bring them along with us when they just pretended like they didn't just try to ruin us. you know what I mean? like that's the shit it's like the personal stuff like that why this stings us a little more than maybe people out there.

01:58:37 --> 01:59:33

BB: Right. Yeah, it's funny. And that's why even in lesser examples, like when we've had prominent influencers uh slam us for not covering certain things like what comes to mind for me is infamous Arizona accounts of the mob and the cartels and all this evidence that was going to be dropped in a new book and we didn't want to cover it because we thought it looked super suspect And we were not only publicly shamed for it by big accounts, but were privately DMed and shamed for it as well. And those people can go fuck themselves, right? It's like, and again, it would be different if they came back and said, hey, you know, you were right about this. My bad. Like, all right, man, people have done that before. And then, you know, we move forward. Yeah, not many. But yeah, that's the type of thing. I mean, it's pretty common sense. And I think

theories of patriot control over the media

01:59:35 --> 01:59:54

BB: I think the stuff we've seen in a micro in the info in like the info war pocket that we're in, we're kind of seeing a macro version of it play out where it really it's starting to look like that crabs in a bucket mentality. And the whole originally (Jon: you've ever heard that before?) crabs in a bucket?

01:59:55 --> 01:59:57

Jon: Is that like a northeast coast thing?

01:59:58 --> 02:01:01

BB: Oh, I don't know. Maybe I think it's a normal saying, but basically it's the idea that if you put like putting crabs in a bucket is the ultimate condemnation of collectivism, because if you put 10 crabs in a bucket, they could crawl up of up each other to get out of the bucket but crabs instinctively pull other things down so when one crab is at the lip of the bucket the other crabs will pull them down to try to get out and it's like it's like uh most drownings actually happen during uh most drownings in rescues happen to the person rescuing the drowner right? But yeah, the crabs in a bucket mentality, I think you're seeing it in the media. And the original kind of direction I wanted to go in with this was the media control thing that you mentioned earlier. We go back and forth on it all the time. But to me, Patriot control over the media, I think you earlier said strings cut. And that's probably done to my head if I'm like, how does how do patriots leverage control over the media?

02:01:01 --> 02:01:05

Jon: Well, is there any is there any way we can get Miss Bright to come put a gun to your head and see how?

02:01:06 --> 02:01:54

BB: Yes, she could put a sword to my head. I would say that while I play with the idea of direct seeding Ghost in the Machine, I think there's some of that going on, but we're never going to know. I think it's more likely that the Patriot control over the media, we're seeing the end stages of it. It's not that the Patriots are necessarily handing down the new Go orders. I think it's that they've removed the Go orders. So now you're seeing... Jake Tapper do, to your point, what he thinks is the best choice. And you're seeing Chris Cuomo rebrand himself and you're seeing Rachel Maddow say, we have to get the orange man at any cost. And that's kind of how I see it. Like it's the archipelago theory.

02:01:55 --> 02:03:50

Jon: yeah I am and it's no secret like I've never been a believer in the full control stuff I I've always thought it's it's been a real back and forth between good and evil like there are the bad people have a say but because of what Trump did before leaving office that that was kind of like the checkmate for him like that was I've got you now and it's just been a matter of the rest of the moves being played out but them stealing the election and Trump using wartime powers to implement like having the evidence and all that stuff it's game over for them and I think the media is is in there too like I don't think they have full control of the media but the example I shared earlier in our private chat was back when when Trump during COVID like think about how Trump manipulates the media with some of the things that he says Trump was saying like I'm the father of the vaccine he's trying to take credit for the vaccine and instinctually the media would just had to correct him so they would come out and say no Trump actually didn't create the vaccine. Trump trump had very little to actually do with this vaccine like all these things about and so it's funny like where these these other right-wing influencers are trying to get Trump to apologize for the vaccine because he's essentially taking credit for it but the reason he's doing is to get the media to correct the record for it and this is almost the way I look at that chart too like he keeps pointing this arrow on the chart too and the media comes out like I've seen multiple articles on it now like Trump keeps using this chart he didn't actually leave office in April and actually that wasn't even the lowest immigration in his presidency it was actually lower at this point in his presidency like also fact checking and providing more reasons for Trump's border policies but whatever that's how I think it is I think Trump manipulates these people because they hate him so much they think he's so stupid they think he is the caricature that he portrays himself as and so they feel the need to like correct him on everything he says and they don't even realize that he's playing him like a fiddle

02:03:51 --> 02:04:20

BB: yeah yeah. I mean I agree I think it's why on a purely narrative level I've wrote the master series just about trying to debunk that stuff you know like. Or this whole audience understands that Trump is not an idiot. They understand that he's probably a very, very smart guy. But... It was about charting a path and paying attention to the specific strategies he uses. The one you point out about the vaccine is a great one. There's all these techniques he uses.

Rumble Rants

02:04:20 --> 02:05:48

BB: I had written aside of truth like a year and a half ago or so just about the asides because I was like, this is something he does all the time. And now granted, it's a natural thing for him. He isn't pre-planning all of his asides. I don't think that that's what's going on. but he speaks in that way naturally and that allows him to thread in all of these nuggets all these pieces of signal while take while allowing for plausible deniability. like oh I was just making an analogy there right I wasn't actually saying anything directly and if you start paying attention to that you understand and to your point I think the biggest thing he does like the most effective technique he's used that probably goes in line with the whole devolution theory and a lot of the patriot plan has been "lay out the bait let the enemy take it" right? like Russia gate just name your scandal one of my favorite ones that I think is the most obvious is quid pro quo with Ukraine the perfect phone call right whatever you think of Zelensky Trump knew that the phone call was clean So he does the briar patch thing that Kyle always talks about where he's like, oh, whatever you do, don't listen to the phone call, anything but the phone call. And then the phone call comes out and it's great. It's a great, it's a perfect phone call. And that leads right into the Joe Biden quid pro quo with Ukraine. So he's done it over and over again.

02:05:49 --> 02:06:45

Jon: yeah I think you're spot on and he also has this weird way of like and it's not even weird but he always like speaks the truth when he's doing these asides like he can be a little hyperbolic for sure and he has a certain method of like everything that he does is everything that he's seen is the greatest thing everybody's seen and nobody could believe it you know but that's like more of just that caricature that he presents but he's actually telling you the truth like when he says that I'm a wartime president that's that was a real thing when he when he says these asides and he goes into these things I think there are certain things he knows he can't go into and he'll catch himself on his aside sometimes like changing course and and preventing himself from going all the way there of like actually disclosing some things he shouldn't but then sometimes it's like he doesn't give a shit like (BB: yeah) you know "the second term which we're sort of having right now" like that's pretty fucking direct you know it's I don't know yeah I love watching him talk

02:06:45 --> 02:07:46

BB: and you can see why I got such a kick out of Trump making an aside I mean he's done it a few times now because he knew that people liked it I think but a few weeks ago the first time he did the uh he did an aside about his asides right it's like There was a lot of... Some people say that I don't know where I'm going with it, but there was a lot of stories told there in that aside. And then he sort of did... Now he's branded it The Weave. And he did that on the Rogan podcast where he's talking about The Weave. I watched a little bit of... Rogan does a fight companion podcast when he's not commentating on a UFC live he'll do one with like Eddie Bravo and Brendan Schaub and some of those guys but he did one on Saturday with (Jon: Eddie right?) yeah with Eddie and Eddie was asking him about Trump's speaking style like Rogan was like, yeah, you know, it's hard. He kind of goes everywhere. And Eddie was like, it's the weave, man. You got to fall into the weave. But we know Eddie is all about the signal. He knows what's going on.

02:07:46 --> 02:07:58

Jon: Yeah, he's going to be on our Badlands Election Day coverage. Got that confirmed. So as long as he doesn't change his mind. That's happened before. We'll be like, hey, man, come on, come on. And then like, hey, so here's Link coming on.

02:07:58 --> 02:08:00

BB: Put me on with him so we can just talk fights.

02:08:01 --> 02:08:05

Jon: Not happening. I'm going to need a little quid pro quo if I'm putting you on with Eddie Bravo.

02:08:06 --> 02:08:07

BB: All right. What do I have to offer?

02:08:07 --> 02:08:11

Jon: Have you even let us know when you're going to be available for Election Day yet?

02:08:12 --> 02:08:13

BB: I'm available pretty much whenever you guys want.

02:08:14 --> 02:08:16

Jon: Whenever Eddie Bravo is. I just happened to be there.

02:08:17 --> 02:09:20

BB: Only Bravo o'clock. No, we'll make that happen. That guy's great. He's infamous. For anybody who doesn't know, who's not a hardcore martial arts person, Eddie Bravo became famous in martial arts for submitting one of the best gracies in a pure grappling match and he did it twice the second time they were both older that was like five years ago. the first time he submitted a prime core lineage gracie with uh Eddie Bravo's Jiu Jitsu his own American brand of Jiu Jitsu that he created uh so that's why he became uh public enemy number one to many brazilians But to Americans, he's really a grappling pioneer. He wasn't a fighter in MMA, but in terms of grappling, he's like, he's a pioneer. People think because of his eccentric personality, that guy is a monster. And he was the dude who trained Joe Rogan in Jiu Jitsu.

02:09:20 --> 02:09:38

Jon: yeah him and Joe Rogan are like besties and some of the my favorite interviews that I've been on have been on his podcast because he's just yeah he's a savage. he's just like so out there with everything it's. he reminds me of Patrick in a lot of ways. yeah. (BB: he is like that) everything's to the extreme. I love it. yeah he's a good dude.

02:09:38 --> 02:10:44

BB: yeah he's great. yeah but he did have a huge accomplishment in grappling so he's not just a rhetoric guy. (Jon: I'm going to text and be like you know Eddie the reason I like you the most I think is that huge accomplishment you had in grappling that's all I want to say) I know you're like who is this guy? (Jon: I honestly didn't really realize who he was when he first reached out) and he submitted him by the way so that's like that's a very big thing so a lot of grappling matches end in points just like you go to the time limit basically the better the grapplers are the more difficult it is to submit them even if you're dominating the match like it's very hard to get a high level black belt to tap out if he knows he's going to lose he'll just ride to the clock he'll just protect himself and Bravo was able to submit the Gracie and the Gracie's basically don't tap. Some of them have had their arms broken in fights because they won't tap. It's a point of pride for them. So that, that was like a huge thing in the martial arts world. Yeah.

02:10:44 --> 02:10:45

Jon: That's crazy.

02:10:46 --> 02:10:57

BB: Yeah. Um, we've got our, just, uh, one more little, little topic before we get to rants. I saw this come across my feed tonight from, um,

New York Times Maggie fifth strategy societal mobilization

02:10:58 --> 02:11:37

BB: Molly Hemingway had originally posted it but this is just talking about some of these scenarios it kind of goes in line with what we're talking about with the media New York Times we used to call I mean it's called the gray lady in journalism school I mean this is still the paper of record so there's still the narrative center of the establishment and it says there are four anti-trump pathways we failed to take there is a fifth So this is just an op-ed, totally not the opinion of the New York Times, just their editorial board. And Maggie had summarized the points, but pretty much scenario one is...

02:11:38 --> 02:11:38

Jon: Can you share this, by the way?

02:11:38 --> 02:11:42

BB: Sorry. Yeah. It's the archive in the StreamYard chat.

02:11:43 --> 02:11:43

Jon: Okay.

02:11:44 --> 02:11:44

BB: Here we go.

02:11:44 --> 02:11:45

Jon: Okay.

02:11:46 --> 02:13:51

BB: scenario one is the classic win an election right? if you got some fascist hitler guy coming up you just try to beat them in the election scenario two is banning the candidate from the ballot making him ineligible etc scenario two has obviously failed. scenario three having the GOP overturn its voters. That's that's how molly summarizes their argument um Scenario three in this piece, they basically go into, you know, if we can't stop it, if we as the establishment can't stop it, the GOP has to stop it. We have to see somebody in that party do it. That's not working either. Scenario four talks about establishment resistance and hilariously uses the EU and recent election situations in France and Germany as examples of where the AFD alternative for Germany party has been surging they're going to get a majority so the other parties form a coalition and they're trying to make that party ineligible in France Macron um was just completely repudiated in their elections so what what do they do the majority which is the Marine le Pen sort of populist Trump segment of france they are now being uh attacked by a coalition where these different leftist groups have joined together so that's one of them and then the fifth one Maggie calls it a color revolution just go back go down to some of what they say here. This seems to be what the New York Times is maybe maybe not advocating of the stage we're at now. That leaves a fifth strategy societal mobilization democracy's last fashion of defense is civil society when the constitutional order is under threat, influential groups and societal leaders must speak out reminding citizens of the red lines that democratic societies must never cross And when politicians cross those red lines, society's most prominent voices must publicly and forcefully repudiate them. So this is actually where she talks about the AFD.

02:13:51 --> 02:13:55

Jon: This is fascinating.

02:13:56 --> 02:13:58

BB: Public declarations. Go ahead.

02:13:59 --> 02:15:14

Jon: This whole thing here, maybe we've been under, I don't know the right word for this, underestimating their willingness to do anything. And we haven't been paying attention enough as to why they're directly accusing Trump of being Hitler now. It's not just like, well, he's kind of a fascist. He's going to be an authoritarian. The language is heating up. And now it's like, last week, he is literally Hitler, guys. He wants generals like Hitler had. He is Hitler. What did they do against Hitler like? The world banded together in a sense to go to war and remove Hitler from power in that country. like is that where they're going with this? is like they want other countries to now like band together and intercede to remove Trump from power like would they be willing to do that is that a is that a possibility. I mean it's it's laughable that they accuse him of being Hitler um I don't think they would ever be willing to do that but to me this is like like if you're a real government who believes in democracy you see two candidates on a ballot there's only like one option like the winner is the winner unless there's like involved whatever but they're like there's five options that we can use to get this person from being in office and it's all about him being authoritarian and I don't know man

02:15:15 --> 02:15:26

BB: Yeah. I mean, in terms of what they're willing to do, I would say it's similar to what we talked about with some of the knowingly, the knowingly word.

02:15:26 --> 02:15:26

Jon: Yeah.

02:15:27 --> 02:16:34

BB: The more implicated these people are. the more they have to lose and the more desperate they are, right? So if you're like a Chris Cuomo who was just peddling bullshit to make money, then you probably don't have that much skin in the game. Like, what do you have to lose? Your reputation, a source of income. Those are big things, but they're not existential threats. now if you're a media figure who doubles as an intel asset and your intel could be seen as treasonous to the United States, you have a little bit more to lose and if you're maybe a foreign nation that knows that if Trump gets back in there the cash cow to your nation all of your national defense maybe some of your dirty secrets and your dirty laundry is going to be aired you have a lot to lose. So I think they'd be willing to do basically anything, but it's pretty fascinating to see it. They try to talk around it in stuff like this. They're never going to completely call for revolution. They say a civil response. Go ahead.

02:16:34 --> 02:18:05

Jon: Well, it's interesting. They're calling out these businesses, right? They're like, you in the public, we need societal intervention. You guys need to be denouncing basically Trump and then they go like we had a bunch of people after J6 who said they wouldn't contribute to any lock makers who voted to decertify the results in 2020 unfortunately most of these companies including AT&T Boeing Comcast GE General Motors Home Depot Lockheed Martin Pfizer UPS Verizon and Walmart soon abandoned their pledge Politico identified more than 100 companies and business groups that pledged to suspend or review donations to election deniers in early 2021. More than 70 of them resumed contributions to election deniers prior to the midterms. So they're basically like, they're trying to shame people now into denouncing Trump. That's what this feels like. When it comes to how desperate these people are, just one more thing real quick. When it comes to how desperate these people are, knowing how desperate they are and knowing what they've already put us through, that's another one of the reasons why I think I would not put them past them to steal it no matter how ridiculous the steal is. (BB: yeah) because at least they can come out with that announcement on November 15th that Kamala won the election even if nobody believes it they can at least still say that and they're they're at least fighting from the defensive standpoint of trying to defend their you know what I mean? (BB: yeah) like which I think to them is as ridiculous as it sounds that that's the more advantageous spot for them to be in even though it's also a very advantageous spot for Trump to be in because it's going to be so obvious

02:18:06 --> 02:20:43

BB: We're all trying to put together our maps of how it's going to play out. And I think that we keep focusing for good reason on on November 5th, because obviously it's a mass inflection point. It's the election. What's going to happen? But I think that. I'm really starting to look at it as this two-step process. We've got the election and then we've got the inauguration. We've got the certification. They mentioned in this New York Times piece certification or decertification. So you and Kyle in particular have been talking about that for quite a while. Now, with everything that we've talked about tonight and for months on these shows, we think there has to be disclosure. And most of the time we're focusing on the election systems for a good reason. But in the words of Tony Stark, I always say, is it too much to ask for both? Can we get, is there a scenario where we get exposure of election fraud and exposure of the establishment's inability to decertify the election? And that's why, that's another reason why I don't see this November playing out the same way last November, the last one did, because I think we need both disclosures. If the deep state successfully steals the election, then we're not gonna even see the storyline play out of preventing Trump from taking office in January, right? So what scenario gets us both? It would pretty much only be a scenario where Trump wins the election, but there's fraud. That he's exposing and that in his second term, hopefully he actions. And then it forces the establishment to go to plan B in front of the whole world where they're going to try to go down this Jamie Raskin sort of road, right? Otherwise, we're not going to see that part of the movie play out. If they just steal the election, we don't see the Raskin angle. And the fear mongering from the New York Times, which, you know, that's like establishment establishment, right? Sometimes when you read these things, I think people should have in their minds, you know, These are the people who know what is most likely to occur. So these are the people who are gaming out the worst case scenario for them. The person who writes this New York Times op-ed and the editors who pass it through to publish it, they don't think that Trump is not going to be on his way to the White House in January. They think he's going to be on their way and they know that there's an election fraud apparatus arrayed against him. So it's funny. That's where, to me, the media are the ones most dominantly signaling that he's going to be declared the winner and that they're going to have to find a way to stop that either way.

02:20:44 --> 02:21:53

Jon: Yeah, well, I think there's also something to it. You kind of you kind of took a different path there than I thought you were going to go. like these people making this change to calling him an authoritarian and willing to do anything to get power. I think I think Kamala being named the winner and ultimately not being allowed to take office because of fraud or whatever that would fit their narrative of Trump being some sort of authoritarian like they would they would twist it to be see we told you Trump is everything we warned you of and try to further use that to justify whatever whatever Trump is an election and are you still fighting things he's still all these things that's the narrative that I when I said earlier they can defend from that no matter how ridiculous the steal is at least narratively they it's almost like coming to fruition everything they said that would come to fruition but there's there's other things that could happen that would fit that too. but I think in terms of them you steal it no matter what and then fight from there because at least you're you're in a narrative sense holding the levers of power and for them, that's advantageous. But again, I see no situation where this doesn't end with with Trump inaugurated. But you're right. We're all just trying to map this out. None of us know for sure.

02:21:53 --> 02:22:53

BB: Well, that's what they're doing. That's the funny thing, right? That this New York Times article is that it used to be subtle where we would be on the Power Hour like, parsing the news speak and going this is they're gaming out scenarios but lately they're like "scenario number one" and they're all they're like Axios did it uh politico did it now we have the New York times being like so first step one we pretend we're a democracy step two fuck this there's no way this guy's getting in and it has to I can't imagine being a lefty at this point I mean the only people who could earnestly read this whole article and maintain the levels of cognitive dissonance needed are either complete retards or evil communists. Because it opens by basically saying, step one, we wanna have a democratic election, but if we don't get what we want, we're gonna do anything it takes to stop the democratic process from being carried out.

02:22:53 --> 02:25:00

Jon: I also think there is a third option there though, and maybe it trends a little bit towards the retardation. I told this story before, I don't know if it was on any of the shows you run with me, but I had an actual genuine conversation with two leftists three weeks ago. It was one of the more fascinating conversations I've had just because I finally got a glimpse into that worldview. But it was like talking point after talking point. I've been thinking about this almost nightly. How does somebody end up like that and not able to break away? But there's no reason for them to ever tune out of CNN. They're sitting there watching their CNN, Brian Stelter, Rachel Maddow, whatever, MSNBC, whatever they're watching, where they're getting their news from. they believe every single word and they don't see anything in their actual day-to-day life that contradicts it so they have no reason to not believe it's true and so there is this representation of Trump out there that he is this threat to actual democracy whatever authoritarian figure all these things And the reason they believe it is because they've never seen anything to contradict it. And anytime they have a conversation with somebody who contradicts it. And this is how our conversation started. I walked out on the patio at my girlfriend's house and her dad was the one talking to him. And the neighbor was like cursing. I'm like, fuck this. Fuck you. I'm leaving. I'm out of here. Like he was going to storm off. And luckily, her dad's like, no, like, what do you do? Let's just talk. Let's just talk. Let's have a conversation here. We can be friends, even though we disagree. And like, calm them down. And then we just had a two hour conversation about why do you think Trump is this? You know, that was debunked, right? Why do you think Trump is this? Let me show you this on my phone, how that was debunked. Like, it was me repeatedly debunking all these claims they had. But when they said that they were in tears over the debate when Trump... I can't believe Trump said on stage that Haitians were eating cats and dogs because these people have been through so much. I was like, oh my gosh, you guys are so lost. Watch something other than MSNBC.

02:25:01 --> 02:25:31

BB: Man, it's crazy. I mean, I know the culture war YouTube guys sometimes talk about this, but... If you watch the Disney Star Wars movies, the way the ultra-diverse, ultra-emotional rebel alliance acts in the Disney Star Wars movies toward the Empire is how people like that see themselves in this reality.

02:25:32 --> 02:25:33

Jon: I have no context to what you mean.

02:25:34 --> 02:27:04

BB: Basically, the screaming liberal meme from 2016, the woman in the streets, they see themselves in this fictionalized version of the world like they are good people. Because people, unless you're just a complete psychopath, most human beings were protagonist-based. It's like, I'm the main character of my story. It's very difficult to think of yourself, especially if you're stupid. As a bad person, like people that we perceive of as bad people, they don't see themselves that way. I mean, most of them don't. If they're a psychopath, they might. But most normal people that are voting for Kamala Harris and crying about Haitians, they don't see themselves as bad people. They see themselves as good people. So what they will do is I think they'll take any story they are told that allows them to map onto that framework, they'll take, right? So you debunked all of their logical, they were going to get you with all these gonzo journalist things. None of it's working because you have the truth on your side. But if the truth that you're saying to them, it's an existential threat, not to them as people, but to their personalities. Because their whole worldview is, wait, I'm a member of the good people. I'm the rebel alliance standing up to the empire, which is Trump. If what you're saying about him is true, then it means my whole personality is based on nothing. Therefore, I don't have a personality to fall back on.

02:27:05 --> 02:27:41

Jon: yeah like that's why some of this disclosure stuff is going to be so fascinating because the reactions from some of these people once their entire worldview collapses is I mean honestly like at this point this late in the game when they've there has been so many opportunities to you kind of wake up a little bit I'm kind of going to enjoy that part like I'm yeah whatever like I don't wish bad upon anybody but I'm I might laugh at you while you while you scream on January 20th as Trump gets inaugurated. Like, how are you still that person? You know what I mean? But it is what it is. That's a good metaphor there. I like that.

02:27:42 --> 02:29:38

BB: What the other epiphany I've had dealing with people like this, a saying I've used for years and years in my personal life is the truth doesn't become the truth. It always was. that's just like a personal personal mantra of mine and it sounds so self-evident to us right especially somebody like you who's an evidence-based positive indicator guy right? when you found the evidence to back up your devolution theory, that evidence didn't pop into existence when you found it you knew it was codifying something that already occurred right? about past events. What I think I've noticed about a lot, a worrying number of normal people is that they believe that something becomes true when they find it out. And what that does, the implications of that is that if somebody is lying to them about something for years and then tells them the truth about it, they still like that person because they were the source of the truth. Like, it's a weird time thing where, like, my in-laws, they fucking love CNN, right? They now acknowledge, and Chris Cuomo, ironically, was their favorite anchor because they loved COVID. They loved COVID stories. They were like, they were COVID super fans, as Chris would call them. And they loved Chris Cuomo, owning the MAGA, Chuds, who weren't putting the masks on, and we were all dying, right? All of us died. But... When Cuomo was shamed and run out of town and all of their reporting on COVID was proven bullshit and they acknowledge now on the air, on CNN, that they way over blew it and we didn't know what we know now, they still watch it every day. Because now they must be telling us the truth about everything. It's just that over the last forever, they were wrong about everything.

02:29:39 --> 02:29:52

Jon: That's what's so crazy. It's like, We'll acknowledge that we got caught lying to you. And it's true that we got caught. And it's true that we were lying. But that was the only thing we were lying about. So stay tuned.

02:29:52 --> 02:29:54

BB: Or that we were wrong about.

02:29:55 --> 02:29:56

Jon: That's nuts, man.

Aside and weave

02:29:57 --> 02:29:59

BB: All right, Rumble Rants.

02:29:59 --> 02:30:04

Jon: I just want to note that I'm willing to go longer. Bernie Bright's the one shortening this show.

02:30:04 --> 02:30:06

BB: Oh, trust me. We haven't hit the Rumble Rants.

02:30:07 --> 02:30:08

Jon: Oh, okay.

02:30:09 --> 02:30:13

BB: So we'll see. We'll see where these go. We spend about 20, 25 minutes on each rant.

02:30:14 --> 02:30:16

Jon: Okay, I'm done.

02:30:16 --> 02:30:34

BB: Tom Terrific, $54.25. Trump's rally at MSG has me jazzed up. I look forward to Election Day. Being jazzed up works if there's a rug as well. He wants everybody jazzed up for the rug. Brent Dwayne Cates, 10 bucks. My man crush on BB is not weird.

02:30:36 --> 02:30:37

Jon: Not weird, but that is a little gay.

02:30:37 --> 02:30:37

BB: Yeah.

02:30:39 --> 02:30:39

Jon: Which is fine.

02:30:39 --> 02:30:40

BB: It is a little weird.

02:30:41 --> 02:30:44

Jon: I think the Cates bros are coming to Myrtle Beach.

02:30:44 --> 02:30:47

BB: Oh, awesome. Oh, and Dwayne, good to hear that you must be doing better.

02:30:47 --> 02:30:52

Jon: Yeah, I think he's in Florida. He started the Brian Cates routine.

02:30:52 --> 02:30:54

BB: Oh, sweet.

02:30:54 --> 02:30:58

Jon: Of everything. And yeah, I believe they're both coming to Myrtle Beach. So looking forward to seeing them again.

02:30:58 --> 02:31:03

BB: That'll be good to see you guys. Yeah, I think Brian's been doing carnivore, right?

02:31:03 --> 02:31:10

Jon: Yep. And like tannin every day. He's a bronze goddess now.

02:31:11 --> 02:31:18

BB: Like Zach. Julia Alberta. Tiffany is also in Trump Tower. Tiffany's is also in Trump Tower.

02:31:19 --> 02:31:22

Jon: Tiffany is too, probably. Tiffany and Tiffany's.

02:31:23 --> 02:31:26

BB: I don't feel like I know any Tiffany's of our generation.

02:31:27 --> 02:31:31

Jon: I had breakfast at her place once, but, um,

02:31:33 --> 02:32:05

BB: how dare you? Q of sorts, three, 25 bucks, Melania zebra dress, meaning power and strength, wealth and status. People are Googling zebra pattern meanings. This is what you've done to us. Patriots. They owe us. Uh, thank you Q. Fixed bayonets and 30 bucks over. I feel like you guys discovered a new Mandela effect with a cake quote. Yeah, that's a, That's an interesting one. Where was the inflection point? What year did the shift occur?

02:32:05 --> 02:32:14

Jon: I don't know. I still have the chart pulled up. I'm probably going to frame this and be like the time I proved Bernie Bright wrong about something.

02:32:14 --> 02:32:18

BB: There's literally a cross there right in the 40s. Is this the key to everything?

02:32:19 --> 02:32:37

Jon: It looked like right back in 1829 there was a jump for the have your cake needed to it was in point zero zero zero zero zero zero zero five five five percent of all I would have guessed yeah that was gonna be my guess but then it really switched um in 1938 man this might be some

02:32:43 --> 02:33:12

BB: was that around the time that the federal reserve happened no it was 1913. okay what happened in 1938 like a war this is why we went to war to change the beginning of World War II (BB: yeah this is where it all changed) it's all about the phrasing crazy uh ginger because 20 bucks do y'all think we've seen the October surprise yet well we haven't seen it with Kamala I mean Maybe we're not going to see it. I don't know.

02:33:13 --> 02:33:24

Jon: I don't think so. I think we're going to I think the last weekly this next week here is going to be nuts. I think we're going to see some things. It's going to be that Matthew McConaughey meme where he's like smoking.

02:33:26 --> 02:33:27

BB: Have you seen that show?

02:33:28 --> 02:33:29

Jon: Which show is it?

02:33:29 --> 02:33:30

BB: True Detective.

02:33:31 --> 02:33:31

Jon: Oh, yeah. Yeah.

02:33:32 --> 02:33:32

BB: Season one. Yeah.

02:33:32 --> 02:33:38

Jon: I didn't see it until I met the guy. I was like, OK, I better watch this now. And it was fucking awesome.

02:33:40 --> 02:34:05

BB: Yeah, that's like the all-timer series for me. All-timer season of television. If you guys in the chat have not watched True Detective Season 1, it is made for you. Zero O'Clock sent 17 bucks over. Tonight, the boss talked about getting upgrades on airplanes. He said upgrades a few times. Drop 2224 is the only one with upgrade in it, tracking 330,000 IPs.

02:34:09 --> 02:34:10

Jon: That's the meme I was talking about.

02:34:10 --> 02:34:15

BB: Yeah, that's the episode where he's doing meth to go undercover.

02:34:16 --> 02:34:16

Jon: Yep.

02:34:18 --> 02:34:23

BB: So good. Yeah, I mean, look for those comms. He drops a lot.

October Surprise and Patriot control on Amazon AWS, Google Search? McDonald as a test? use the weapon of the enemy against him

02:34:23 --> 02:34:42

BB: One thing I was going to say about the October surprise is if we don't see one, but we continue to see this weird capitulation toward Trump winning, you know, it would make me think trump seeded out the October surprise as a get you better get the line

02:34:42 --> 02:35:04

Jon: oh right let's see it's the the Hillary thing that's what's like piqued my interest she she knows she's why would you say that especially the pizzagate angle and with all the pd stuff like that's where my money's at is if we're going to see an October surprise it's going to be right up the P. Diddy pizzagate alley and it's probably going to be on Kamala

02:35:06 --> 02:35:09

BB: It might just be something innocuous like her being a total whore.

02:35:10 --> 02:35:12

Jon: But I mean, that's not a surprise to anybody.

02:35:12 --> 02:35:16

BB: I guess that normies would it be? Or would it gain her votes?

02:35:18 --> 02:35:19

Jon: Who knows?

02:35:19 --> 02:35:23

BB: Who knows? I mean, it turned Kardashian into a celebrity.

02:35:24 --> 02:36:04

Jon: when you think October surprise you think scandal or something that's going to like denigrate a candidate in a big way publicly. They're probably going to want to do it as close to the election as possible so it can't be debunked right so it'll probably be in this next week they won't have the ability to remove it from social media. Trump has been on the phone with sundar from google he revealed that over um the Rogan interview when he was talking about yeah sundar from google called me and said that the McDonald's thing went nuts so they probably won't be able to pull it from from google plus Bezos and like Trump's got all the whatever this is is not going to be able to be censored this time and it's

02:36:04 --> 02:36:51

BB: that's a great point yeah Bezos and Sundar because Bezos for anybody who doesn't know Amazon website people talk about Amazon but yeah AWS is the power of amazon uh that That is, they control so much of web power. Google to a lesser degree, but Google AI, Google search, as you said. So this is more the angle of Patriot control that I think somebody like you and I think a lot of people can get on board with, which is, hey, we don't have control over everything. But if we go to Jeff Bezos and if we go to Sundar and we say, Listen, motherfuckers. It might be some 13818 shit. Yeah. Seizures.

02:36:52 --> 02:36:53

Jon: Sorry, I didn't mean to interrupt there.

02:36:54 --> 02:37:06

BB: No, that's where it would go. It would be those companies. It would be seizures of those kinds of companies, right? They're not going to seize the companies publicly. That's not going to be in the public story. They're probably going to be run by the same guys.

02:37:07 --> 02:37:21

Jon: Like, has Trump ever acknowledged Sundar before? Ever? I don't think I've ever heard him mention him talking to like the Sundar or whatever his name is at Google. Like, that's that's a huge disclosure. Oh, man. Yeah, that's that's got to be.

02:37:24 --> 02:37:27

BB: Which also makes me think, was McDonald's a test?

02:37:29 --> 02:37:29

Jon: Ooh, maybe.

02:37:30 --> 02:37:38

BB: Because they knew it would go super memetic. It would go super viral because it was funny and weird and silly, right? So was it a reach test?

02:37:40 --> 02:38:09

Jon: Okay. Also, that's a good point, number one. But also... Think about the lawsuits against the antitrust lawsuits against Google to like destroy it essentially or split it up and Amazon. That's like perfect cover because it's like nothing's going on here. Nothing's different here. But you've actually taken control of it. And you want to dismember it anyway when it's all said and done. But here, until that's done, you have the control and can't let it... Oh, man. Interesting.

02:38:09 --> 02:38:21

BB: That's one of my things I've said. Even though it's bad in the Lord of the Rings, Baromir's appeal was to use the weapon of the enemy against him. And I think in this transition era, that's exactly what we're doing.

02:38:21 --> 02:38:22

Jon: But look what happened to Baromir.

02:38:23 --> 02:38:26

BB: Yeah, I know. But he died well, at least. Amazon will die well.

02:38:28 --> 02:38:30

Jon: but he was kind of a douche before he died.

02:38:30 --> 02:38:35

BB: Well, the older I get, the more I, the more I love his story arc and the fellowship.

02:38:37 --> 02:38:38

Jon: Yeah. Yeah.

02:38:38 --> 02:38:51

BB: He goes, he goes full, full redemption arc. Ironically, especially when you read the lore, you'll respect him more because they say the stronger you are, the more drawn you are to the power of the ring.

02:38:52 --> 02:38:52

Jon: Interesting.

02:38:52 --> 02:39:02

BB: So it actually implies that Boromir was like the most, um, Sort of the strongest of the leaders that were in that group.

02:39:02 --> 02:39:05

Jon: Did his brother ever find out how much of a douche he was for a period there?

02:39:06 --> 02:39:07

BB: Yeah, Sam tells him.

02:39:08 --> 02:39:11

Jon: Yeah, Sam does. Okay, I can remember. It's been a while since I've watched that series.

02:39:12 --> 02:39:19

BB: Well, we have to remedy that. I did tell people we would finally do it on Story Hour if Trump is declared the winner of the election. We all know he's going to win.

02:39:20 --> 02:39:20

Jon: Yeah.

02:39:21 --> 02:39:26

BB: But that's how we'll celebrate. We'll subject Chris to the... Oh my gosh. We're going to do two episodes on each scene.

02:39:27 --> 02:39:32

Jon: We you should almost like that would be one of those where you guys don't end early. You just go.

02:39:33 --> 02:39:33

BB: Yeah.

02:39:33 --> 02:39:35

Jon: Until you're done.

02:39:35 --> 02:39:36

BB: The storm.

02:39:36 --> 02:39:38

Jon: Yeah, that's true.

02:39:38 --> 02:39:43

BB: All right. Real mega mama secret that they have Dems going to flip to Republican after the election.

02:39:44 --> 02:39:52

Jon: I like that. Tulsi just did it. That's an interesting thing. Like, do they have other Dems in waiting that are like this? Yeah, we're going to switch.

02:39:53 --> 02:39:59

BB: Whiskey Tango, what if the House-related secret to be revealed after the election is that AOC et al. are ours?

02:40:00 --> 02:40:03

Jon: Hmm. Maybe.

02:40:05 --> 02:40:28

BB: that's Patrick's favorite. At Kim Navillis, 10 bucks. I think Trump's aside about the Lincoln bedroom, he mentions the Emancipation Proclamation being in that room. We're about to be emancipated from the deep state swamp. That's an interesting one. Probably has something to do with that. It could have to do with the Civil War. It could have to do with the fact that Lincoln turned US cannons on American citizens during the Civil War.

02:40:29 --> 02:40:32

Jon: Maybe it just has to do with tall ceilings. The bedroom has tall ceilings.

02:40:32 --> 02:40:41

BB: It could be. Whiskey Tango wasn't the Lincoln bedroom thing during Clinton's presidency because the Clintons either charged money for people to stay there or they used it as a favor and benefit.

02:40:42 --> 02:40:53

Jon: Could be. It could also be that Trump just actually loved that bedroom and he just wanted to talk about it. He's got three hours to fill, which you'd think is no problem, but just talk. Who knows?

02:40:55 --> 02:40:58

BB: 1027.js, 15 bucks, still celebrating my birthday. Well, happy birthday.

02:40:59 --> 02:40:59

Jon: Happy birthday, Joe.

02:40:59 --> 02:41:10

BB: Wait, 10... Hold on. This is all making sense. 1027.js was born on 1027 and sent a rant in on 1027. Decode that.

02:41:11 --> 02:41:12

Jon: That's pretty good.

02:41:12 --> 02:41:12

BB: Get that stormy.

02:41:13 --> 02:41:33

Jon: I found out Chris's birthday. I wrote this down to make sure. Chris's birthday... is on the first and I still need people to remind me to wish him that birthday on the first so I don't forget but it is Joe's birthday 1027 js's birthday until his birthday because of the birthday rules you established so

02:41:33 --> 02:41:45

BB: that's true yep. that's fair. I'll allow it. has standing. whiskey tango p.s I accidentally tagged myself in the first round because I'm on my phone and couldn't see the screen I almost sent you five hundred dollars instead of five dollars too

02:41:46 --> 02:41:47

Jon: We would have liked the $500 ramp better.

02:41:47 --> 02:41:48

BB: We'll just try it out again.

02:41:48 --> 02:41:54

Jon: Yeah. I mean, we liked the $5 ramp, but $500 would have been bigger.

02:41:54 --> 02:42:12

BB: That gets you a lap dance. Salt Muncher, to be fair, you probably wouldn't say Dude Jerome. You would probably say Ugg? Dude Jerome. Oh, he's making the sound that you would make if Jerome Powell was lighting your pants on fire.

02:42:13 --> 02:42:14

Jon: Oh, I get it.

02:42:14 --> 02:42:18

BB: You'd probably be really displeased at the turn of events.

02:42:19 --> 02:42:23

Jon: My brother Jerome, how dare you?

02:42:23 --> 02:42:24

BB: How could you do this to me?

02:42:24 --> 02:42:27

Jon: You're only supposed to light the economy on fire, not our pants.

02:42:29 --> 02:42:43

BB: 10 for VP Nichols, 10 bucks. Regarding linguistics and inflation, DJT is saying he will end inflation, not reverse inflation, not get inflation to zero, but end inflation. He's ending the system in which inflation is a thing. Great point.

02:42:44 --> 02:43:04

Jon: is a great point point I like that point yeah.

02:43:05 --> 02:43:31

BB: see sometimes it's that like besides Trump asides he says super simple things that you're like you just gloss over but then you go back to them and you realize he just told you (Jon: I really love that point that was that was a great rant) end inflation how do you do that? you yeah yeah that's a great one because in order to end inflation you literally have to end fiat monetary systems because they act they inflate it's like (Jon: you'd have to go all Bitcoin that that might be my favorite rant of the other than the imaginary 500 one we almost got right that was great so far) sparrow what scenario do you envision Trump's sentencing on 11 26. I bet it's going to get delayed again

02:43:32 --> 02:43:42

Jon: Probably. We shall see. But depending on how things play out, like when that goes to jail, like, yes, wins the election. We need to put this guy in jail immediately.

02:43:42 --> 02:43:47

BB: I love it. Yeah, he's going to jail. That's the pick.

02:43:49 --> 02:43:50

Jon: Could be fascinating.

02:43:50 --> 02:44:07

BB: Do it for us, Donnie. John Quincy Adams, 17, 17 bucks. Fact, smoke detectors cannot protect you from someone coming into your house and lighting your pants on fire. That's another. It's a defective thing I often have ranted about my anxiety about smoke detectors.

02:44:07 --> 02:44:09

Jon: You have anxiety over smoke detectors? Why is that?

02:44:09 --> 02:44:30

BB: yeah um like once a week I will just remember with dread that they could just go off if the battery dies oh yeah all of them go off (Jon: I got mine like wired in) yeah that's what mine was that's terrible though here my like if the battery dies even though it has wired power they'll still go off

02:44:31 --> 02:44:33

Jon: Oh, you must have some bad fire detectors.

02:44:33 --> 02:44:33

BB: It's bullshit.

02:44:34 --> 02:44:49

Jon: No, it's funny. Like my kids had a fire week at school and I learned more about fire safety than I even knew possible. Like I have a fire plan in my, I have like three exits in my house and I have a fire plan of like, if we're in this room, this is the door we're going to go out. Like it's, this is so funny. but yeah I was quizzed about the fire detectors and when the batteries were replaced and if they work and all that shit so I'm up to code.

02:44:50 --> 02:45:29

BB: I received I received photo evidence of Jon at that specific section so you're telling me stop drop and roll the first two make sense they're rolling I just don't understand Are there any executive orders about this? Crane up $59, $34, $17 for Bay and $17 for me. Q set us on a course, which they didn't expect. So kudos for the Q team, anon's rule. Thank you, Crane. Is Crane going to Myrtle?

02:45:29 --> 02:45:35

Jon: I don't know. I think I saw something in there earlier where he's like, he may not go. I don't know.

02:45:35 --> 02:45:40

BB: Whoa. Wow.

02:45:40 --> 02:45:45

Jon: He's probably still in the chat, so you can confirm or deny. That'd be appreciated.

02:45:45 --> 02:45:46

BB: Confirm or deny.

02:45:47 --> 02:45:50

Jon: John, it's part of being a dad. Not going to Myrtle Beach is part of being a dad.

02:45:53 --> 02:46:14

BB: Oh, that's bullshit. Terry A. 20 bucks. New info was Howard Lutnick working with Elon on the government efficiency. Howard drilled home the income tax free time in our nation and questioned why it's still in place. Notable. Appreciate you both. Good call out. Yeah. A way to make government more efficient is to give it less money, which means tax us less.

02:46:16 --> 02:46:18

Jon: Howard Lutnick. I'm going to look that up.

02:46:19 --> 02:46:34

BB: Prevost 13, thanks for another good show. At several rallies this week, Trump called Anderson Cooper, Allison Cooper. He was very blatant about making sure he said it. Any thoughts? Just curious. Tranny, Tranny, something about Tranny's probably.

02:46:35 --> 02:46:54

Jon: Yeah, I think he just does that to like. I don't know. Drop people's attention to it maybe? Piss people off? Because the media is also running with the narrative of Trump's having dementia. Do you think at some point they pointed out Trump calling Anderson Allison on their network about the interview or something and played the clip of it? I don't know.

02:46:56 --> 02:47:08

BB: Well, it's been said that Barack Obama will claim Kenyan citizenship to avoid prosecution or extradition. So will Anderson Cooper claim Allison Cooper?

02:47:08 --> 02:47:10

Jon: Gender. Maybe.

02:47:12 --> 02:47:17

BB: Keep an eye on Obama Kenya comms. Just saying. That's a pretty specific prediction.

02:47:20 --> 02:47:31

Jon: Craneup says, Jon, I gots to say close to daughters in time of uncertainty. So he's not coming to Myrtle Beach and simultaneously made me feel like a bad father now for going.

02:47:31 --> 02:47:36

BB: Sounds kind of like somebody being a pussy-ass bitch about the election, if you ask me.

02:47:36 --> 02:47:39

Jon: You know, you would still be close to your daughters if you brought them with.

02:47:40 --> 02:48:10

BB: Mm-hmm. told Jon to bring his kids to Gart and you said no way so (Jon: not at this age no way) don't take advice from him (Jon: I can't I can't get two feet away from them like they would be on stage with me the whole event I feel like yeah) uh poso for hope salem witch trials was a land grab by government officials but was it a land grab from witches? Because if so, I'm okay with that, right? Executive order. What's the executive order where I can take stuff?

02:48:11 --> 02:48:18

Jon: Actual witches that were burnt at the stake for burning stakes. Then I'm okay with that land grab too.

02:48:18 --> 02:48:26

BB: The land should go into the public domain. I see no problem with that. They're probably a bunch of bitches.

02:48:26 --> 02:48:31

Jon: Maybe we'll get some disclosure on this with Trump back in too. We want some Salem witch trials disclosure.

02:48:32 --> 02:48:37

BB: Most overrated thing to ever do in New England is to go to Salem, in my personal opinion.

02:48:38 --> 02:48:39

Jon: Never been.

02:48:39 --> 02:49:55

BB: Everybody's all about going to Salem, especially around this week. Don't do it. traffic they do like they do all this stuff there but I mean imagine being those women who were like crushed to death and burned to death and you're like you've turned it into just this candy town thing come see where see where we committed horrible crimes against humanity yeah my dad was one of the people who burned those bitches somebody much older than that. Coat herder 17 bucks per coffee COVID lawyer judges ruled no standing and that lawsuits should have started before the 2020 election many lawsuits before 2024 election is the difference now any thought that they've already been filed maybe (Jon: as Chris says like do the lawsuits matter in a fake election) right (Jon: maybe are they narrative lawsuits or real lawsuits like who knows guys) Blue seven, I 20 bucks though. You both hate each other. Lol. You work great together. That's, that's why it works. We, uh, we're trying to keep this family together, you know, and just when the kids get older, like on Kyle and Chris and Patrick get a little older, Zach and Brad, we'll, we'll bring him. We'll sit him down.

02:49:56 --> 02:49:58

Jon: I think we are the two youngest in Badlands, aren't we?

02:49:58 --> 02:50:05

BB: I meant like, you know, spiritually, in terms of enlightenment, just that kind of thing.

02:50:06 --> 02:50:09

Jon: Yeah. We're definitely the most mature of the crew, I'd say. Right.

02:50:10 --> 02:50:11

BB: Yeah.

02:50:12 --> 02:50:13

Jon: But yeah, I still do hate him.

02:50:13 --> 02:51:01

BB: Yeah. Post-Op for Hope. Commy Cuomo's need to be jailed. Crimes against humanity. we'll see nursing home stuff oh they're all turning on each other in New York as davis 17 bucks what if the election cheating is made to be so obvious the military steps in and what if the scary necessary event is the military tribunals the ending will not be for everyone (Jon: I was told tribunals already happened and all of them have been executed and they're all wearing masks and clones and shit so) yeah that's the truth (Jon: that's about that) Deary conspiracy on X, 20 bucks. You being Navy SEALs from a comment on Sather's post, I believe you too. Others like Robert Breedlove, Jake Chansley, Ian Carroll are Navy secret super soldiers. Prove I'm wrong. Heck, this was the guy. I remember his little frog face.

02:51:01 --> 02:51:04

Jon: What's a neighbor secret soldier?

02:51:04 --> 02:51:12

BB: I am a neighbor secret soldier SEAL. So yeah, that Ian Carroll guy, he's got a massive following.

02:51:12 --> 02:51:33

Jon: You came out of nowhere too, guys. It's one of those things like how are some of these people allowed to be on all the platforms? Or maybe we are just like that butthurt all the time. But it's like seeing some of these people. don't get it. it's just so funny like Ian Carroll's going viral for like seeing him go viral for topics that like

02:51:33 --> 02:51:45

BB: we were talking about years and years ago. Did you know that there's connections between Epstein and Intel?

02:51:45 --> 02:51:46

Jon: yeah you'll never believe it yeah this is funny.

02:51:46 --> 02:51:50

BB: there is more to the P Diddy arrest than anybody knows...

02:51:50 --> 02:51:59

Jon: and then he goes on Alex Jones like they make the rounds to all the same network of people it's just it's crazy.

02:52:00 --> 02:52:10

BB: yep makes you wonder pjw knowing the democrats as we do explain to me why they haven't made come swallow 47 number 47 to take that away from Trump

02:52:12 --> 02:52:12

Jon: Because they can't.

02:52:13 --> 02:52:28

BB: Yeah, that's a good one. Buster Lou, $10. Why do I keep seeing Kamala as Carrie, a.k.a. a horror movie, smiling, happy that she just won, only to have blood dumped all over her only this time deserved? You have a very active imagination.

02:52:28 --> 02:52:28

Jon: I don't get that.

02:52:28 --> 02:52:39

BB: I don't know. Stephen King. Speaking of those who scream the loudest.

02:52:39 --> 02:52:39

Jon: Yeah.

02:52:40 --> 02:52:46

BB: Guy who writes books mostly about crimes against children. Looks really creepy.

02:52:47 --> 02:52:50

Jon: Turns out to be a huge Kamala supporter. Trump hater.

02:52:52 --> 02:53:05

BB: Black Hat Destroyer. Part one, Dan Scavino spoke for 99 seconds a few days ago in Novi, Michigan, then pulled an X-22 and looked up Q drop number 99. Note the date. Let me see if I can...

02:53:06 --> 02:53:08

Jon: I'll pull that up if you want to read the one in between.

02:53:09 --> 02:53:19

BB: Dr. Thump and Stunk, my fam are all libtards with extreme TDS. They wear masks in the airport still. They seriously believe Trump is Hitler and MAGA are all racist and Trump supporters like me are the sheep and brainwashed. yeah they don't think we're Nazis they think we're stupid.

02:53:20 --> 02:54:05

Jon: um but that's the thing if you actually got into a debate with any of those people about the actual stuff where they sat through it and you had to like fact check I guarantee the people in our audience and like we would smoke all those people they they're so condescending but here's that drop (BB: yeah us assets location who was arrested that's the Saudi Arabia ones yep um) Well, first of all, you have to... Yeah, the Scavino one. He says he speaks for 99 seconds. You're number one saying that he somehow intentionally spoke and cut it off at exactly 99 seconds, right?

02:54:07 --> 02:54:09

BB: Or the video is 99 seconds long.

02:54:09 --> 02:54:19

Jon: The video is 99 seconds. It doesn't show him walking up there. It doesn't even look... I don't know. No, it's not. Look at this.

02:54:20 --> 02:54:22

Pet Club 24-7: He's done speaking.

02:54:23 --> 02:54:25

Jon: It's done right there. Two seconds short.

02:54:27 --> 02:54:28

BB: Debunked.

02:54:28 --> 02:54:34

Jon: The clip was 99 seconds. So unless RSBN is part of the queue drops.

02:54:34 --> 02:55:37

BB: If you're looking for Scavino comms, it's got to be from his Twitter or something. That's the only time I'll look at him. Dr. Thump and Stunk, my libtard family believe everything PBS and NPR reports. They'll never wake up unless the MSM starts doing real journalism and starts reporting the truth. The only way libtards wake up to election fraud is Trump wins in a landslide. The MSM calls it election fraud. Liptards parrot this and demand an audit. Audit shows election fraud and that Trump did win. I've actually talked about that for a long time as being my favorite potential scenario. That's what we say with the mirror theory, right? Yeah. they claim election fraud Trump says okay let's uh let's audit (Jon: what you wanted to do in 2016.) exactly gamble thanks for saving BB Jon there's the link not gonna I'm having not did we see that scene in scanners when that dude blew up

02:55:43 --> 02:55:43

Jon: Thanks, Campbell.

02:55:43 --> 02:55:55

BB: That's exactly what I expected somehow. Damodlin, why did Trump not mention Ivanka at MSG tonight? See you at Myrtle. I don't know.

02:55:57 --> 02:55:58

Jon: I'll tell you at Myrtle.

02:55:58 --> 02:56:06

BB: Yeah. We got to check with our handlers. They didn't give us that on the run sheet. Nevada runner, 10 bucks. Great show. Go Patriots.

02:56:06 --> 02:56:07

Jon: Yeah, the Patriots won a game today.

02:56:08 --> 02:56:11

BB: They did. We can still beat the Jets sometimes.

02:56:11 --> 02:56:16

Jon: That's it. At this point, you don't want to be winning because you want a better draft pick, right?

02:56:16 --> 02:56:57

BB: Well, I was going to say that I want Drake May to start getting some wins because he actually looks promising. But then he got concussed immediately in this game. And then you won without him for the first time in a while. We're going to win the Super Bowl. It's pretty obvious. Everybody knows. So... (Jon: it could be) pilot bryce 200 from pilot price pilot price always always flies by with a nice drop like this well not always he was on fire last night too so he's this money this money is for BB Jon gets none because he still has that ohio state sign behind him Kyle gets my subscription money here's to two years of intellectual gold BB glad you aren't just a tiger anymore

02:56:58 --> 02:57:24

Jon: two years of intellectual gold quote Jon Herold was here when that was quoted well number one um "Trump: I didn't know gay dudes like tiger paintings" that's number one number two that's how the money works you don't just get to like put in a rant and be like I want this much here this much here we're not a wealth fund guys we're not financial advisors we split the money so thank you pilot price you can suck it

02:57:26 --> 02:59:33

BB: stephasia did you see this damn playbook plan for election day there's a reason Trump says to vote early tyler bowery I don't know what the plan is but uh (Jon: I'll check yeah) the vote early thing is interesting I have not done it I have not followed the directions I haven't either more so because I'm gonna vote on election day I just think it's so interesting the reason they switched Yeah. Al Phillips, if liar's pants actually caught on fire, a joint session of Congress would look like the firebombing of Dresden. And Jerome Powell was behind all of it, lighting everybody's pants on fire. Luke7486, I like how Trump said, hire American. Illegal immigration is one thing, but it'd also be great to reduce temporary work visas so my apartment can be American again. many such cases pilot bryce five more dollars for BB because he said pussy ass bitch that's my love language right there thanks man you pussy ass bitch hopeful theorist (Jon: every time you call a pussy) another uh five dollars identifying as five hundred dollars hashtag someday John thanks for doing another long show this weekend I appreciate learning that I cannot have my cake after I eat it mind blown great work BB as always I'm here to educate (Jon: yeah this is um so friday we had the long ass liberty den yeah last night) that was mostly rogan's fault and Trump yeah but (Jon: no that was like a four hour show last night I don't remember what time we got done it was like after midnight though I'm pretty sure then tonight what are we on we're on three hours it's pretty good) almost we're almost done though hopeful theorist another five oh I got that g stan lee 19 was Ian Carroll a Bobby Kennedy fan makes sense if he didn't start popping up until bobby went for Trump no he's been around tiktok dude doing debunks and doing conspiracies acceptable conspiracies yeah acceptable did you know the federal reserve is in federal or reserve

02:59:36 --> 02:59:42

Jon: but not a single thing about election fraud. Which I know, it's like my baseline, but I think there's a reason for that.

02:59:42 --> 02:59:45

BB: It's the baseline of their system. That's why we talk about it so much.

02:59:45 --> 02:59:48

Jon: Yep. But not on any of those platforms.

02:59:48 --> 02:59:59

BB: No. Craneop59, $17. No to Myrtle Beach, unfortunately. No to Vegas, too. Especially if at Ahern.

03:00:01 --> 03:00:01

Jon: AR.

03:00:02 --> 03:00:04

BB: Doesn't like... We'll talk.

03:00:04 --> 03:00:05

Jon: We'll chat, man.

03:00:05 --> 03:00:15

BB: All right, Crane. I don't know. I don't know what the drama is between you and Vegas, but... That's all of them? That's all of them.

Boosts

03:00:15 --> 03:00:18

BB: I'll double check, see if we have any boosts at the end.

03:00:19 --> 03:00:19

Jon: Got one more.

03:00:21 --> 03:00:30

BB: Kitsko, I'm voting early due to the fear porn hurricane being predicted for November 5th. We ain't scared of no storm. Knock on wood, but good shit, Kitsko.

03:00:31 --> 03:00:33

Jon: Well, you clearly are if you're voting early because of it.

03:00:34 --> 03:00:42

BB: I drove by a Jeep on the highway today and it was broken down. As most Jeeps tend to be. Kitsko is a Jeep extremist.

03:00:43 --> 03:00:46

Jon: Oh, I have I have a Jeep, but I don't drive it.

03:00:46 --> 03:00:46

BB: Is it broken?

03:00:47 --> 03:00:54

Jon: No, it just I mean, it's not broken like it's drivable. It's drivable. I just don't have confidence.

03:00:55 --> 03:00:55

BB: Yeah.

03:00:55 --> 03:01:23

Jon: Last time I drove it for a long distance, a tire exploded and it gave me a little PTSD. And so I was like, you know what? Yeah, it's time to just bite the bullet. But my son wants it when he drives. He will not let me sell it. He has that kind of attachment to things. He'll open a Christmas present and I have to somehow sneak the box out to the garbage. Otherwise, he'll be like, but I wanted to save it. What if I wanted to put it back in there? I can't get rid of the Jeep until he's out of this phase.

03:01:24 --> 03:02:45

BB: I cried when I was four years old. We lived in the ghetto. My dad had a black Jeep. and we couldn't afford like a better one so he had fixed it so many times and then finally he couldn't fix it and they towed it out of our driveway and I loved cars and traumatic experience (Jon: see I don't want to do that to my kid) yeah I was like screaming at the tow truck driver I was like they're stealing the jeep (Jon: if my kid ever turned out like you because of something I did like that I would never forgive myself so) we never had a jeep again though (Jon: can't do it) So, just saying. Anyway, that's it. Thanks for watching, people. If you want to leave a boost, you can always do that. We'll get it next week. Otherwise, I guess thank you too, Jon. Should be a super normal week. Nothing will happen. Nothing weird. Nothing notable. I'm sure it's just going to be totally normal. Oh, I want people to know. Q people in the audience you will like this it is time the movie for tuesday night is What is it? It is fucking... Not Eye of the Storm. What's the... Eye of the Storm.

03:02:45 --> 03:02:48

Jon: No, it's... The movie is an episode of Eye of the Storm.

03:02:49 --> 03:03:06

BB: It is. Jesus, it's synonymous with Eye of the Storm. White Squall. There it is. Good job, bud. The movie is White Squall, and they're telling me what the movie is. Yeah, so we're going to see... I don't think it's that great of a movie, but we're just going to talk about Q-Drop stuff, probably.

03:03:07 --> 03:03:48

Jon: like you have like early onset like there was an episode last week (BB: something going on) you're like what's that word where you you're you don't let somebody out of prison or whatever they committed crime but you let them out because you couldn't figure it out man (BB: I genuinely worry about head trauma because I took a lot of it uh hopefully not. we probably just do this too much) Maybe it's not easy being fully invested like this. But anyway, whatever. No, it would be great, guys, if you all hit that thumbs up and made this the most watched, most like defected of all time. And then we can just permanently remove Kyle, I think. And I'll just yeah, I'm just kidding. I'm just kidding, Kyle. Get better soon.

03:03:48 --> 03:03:56

BB: Get better, Kyle. We will probably see Kyle Sunday for the last show before the election. Otherwise, we'll see you Wednesday.

03:04:00 --> 03:04:01

Jon: Oh, I'm supposed to end the show, aren't I?

03:04:01 --> 03:04:08

BB: Yeah. Do I end with the... Oh, and thank you LuvLitters for sponsoring us. Go get some litter for your wife or your cat or your Canadian.

03:04:09 --> 03:04:09

Jon: And Pet Club.

03:04:10 --> 03:04:11

BB: Yes.

03:04:11 --> 03:04:14

Jon: So do I just play the intro video as the outro too?

03:04:15 --> 03:04:17

BB: Just do the Badlands outro.

03:04:18 --> 03:04:18

Jon: Okay.

03:04:18 --> 03:04:19

BB: I'm going to do that now.

03:04:19 --> 03:04:21

Jon: So any final thoughts?

03:04:22 --> 03:04:23

BB: For my whole life?

03:04:24 --> 03:04:24

Jon: Just for the show.

03:04:25 --> 03:04:26

BB: No, I'm good.

03:04:27 --> 03:04:27

Jon: Okay, bye.

Outro

03:06:07 --> 03:06:11

Trump: The Badlands, running the Badlands. Explain those Badlands.